Skip to content
Conference Open access

Understanding AI-Assisted EFL Learning: The Roles of Expectancy Value, AI Literacy, and Self-Regulated Learning [Abstract]

2026 · InSITE Conference · pp. 08 · 0 citations

TL;DR

Results indicate that students reported relatively high levels of AI literacy, expectancy value, and self-regulated learning, suggesting that perceived proficiency plays a key role in shaping motivation, AI literacy, and learning regulation in AI-assisted EFL contexts.

Abstract

Aim/Purpose This study investigated how learner-related factors: expectancy value, AI literacy, and self-regulated learning influence university students’ engagement in AI-assisted EFL learning environments. Background While AI-assisted language learning offers personalized and adaptive learning opportunities, its effectiveness depends on learners’ motivation, technological understanding, and ability to regulate their own learning. Methodology A survey research design was employed using a structured questionnaire developed from relevant literature and pilot tested to ensure validity and reliability. The sample consisted of 322 university students from eight universities across northern, central, southern, and eastern Taiwan. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, and one-way ANOVA. Contribution This study provides empirical evidence on how expectancy value, AI literacy, and self-regulated learning jointly shape student engagement in AI-assisted EFL contexts, extending expectancy-value theory into technology-enhanced language learning. Findings Results indicate that students reported relatively high levels of AI literacy, expectancy value, and self-regulated learning. Among sub-dimensions, AI ethics scored the highest, while resource management scored the lowest. No significant gender differences were found. However, significant differences emerged across English proficiency levels for all three variables, suggesting that perceived proficiency plays a key role in shaping motivation, AI literacy, and learning regulation. Recommendations for Practitioners Educators should design AI-assisted EFL activities that enhance learners’ motivation, develop AI literacy (especially ethical awareness), and support self-regulated learning strategies, particularly in resource management. Recommendations for Researchers Future studies should explore causal relationships among these variables, incorporate longitudinal designs, and examine how instructional interventions can strengthen AI literacy and self-regulated learning in diverse contexts. Impact on Society By improving understanding of learner factors in AI-assisted education, this study supports the development of more effective and equitable technology-enhanced language learning environments. Future Research Further research should investigate how different types of AI tools influence learning outcomes, as well as how individual differences such as proficiency, motivation, and digital competence interact over time in AI-supported learning contexts.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

AI Literacy and Self-Perceived Cognitive Learning Outcomes Among University Students in AI-Integrated Courses: Associations with Instructor Feedback and AI Use Indicators

The findings suggest that the quantity of AI use and learners’ competency to understand, evaluate, and self-regulate AI use are empirically distinct indicators that universities should measure separately.

Yu Eun Lee, Jinsook Kan · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

How Cognitive Factors and Motivation Shape Learners' Engagement in AI ‐Supported Language Learning?: Insights From the Combined SEM and fsQCA Approaches

These findings provide theoretical support for SCT in technology‐mediated learning and suggest practical strategies for educators, including tailoring instructional design to learners' cognitive profiles, fostering motivation and self‐efficacy and leveraging AI tools to enhance active and sustained engagement in langua...

Yifan Wang, Ran Zhi · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Designing for AI literacy: psychological mechanisms and self-determination

It is demonstrated that instructional design affects AI literacy through differentiated motivational pathways rather than through a uniform activation of all three psychological needs, rather than through a uniform activation of all three psychological needs.

Su-Qian Yu, Yu-Xi Lin, Chen Chen · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Who Am I as a Learner in the Age of Artificial Intelligence?: Exploring University Students' Identity Construction in AI-Mediated Learning

How university students construct their learner identities in the era of artificial intelligence is explored, highlighting the identity-related dimensions of AI-mediated learning and offering insights into what it means to be a learner in an increasingly AI-driven educational landscape.

R. Venketsamy, Naelul Rohmah · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.