Skip to content

Hierarchical type-II fuzzy logic routing scheme enabled with PSO algorithm in flying ad hoc networks

Aug 2026 · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology · 0 citations · 34 references

TL;DR

A hierarchical type-II fuzzy logic system integrated with a particle swarm optimization algorithm aimed at enhancing the quality of service parameters and addressing the curse of dimensionality caused by the exponential growth of fuzzy rules is introduced.

Abstract

Flying ad hoc networks—composed of self-organizing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)—offer numerous applications in various fields, including military operations, industry, and agriculture. Due to the UAV network's unique characteristics, such as high node velocity, sparse UAV distributions, and frequent topology changes, their data routing encounters significant challenges, compromising the quality of service aspects. We introduce a hierarchical type-II fuzzy logic system integrated with a particle swarm optimization algorithm aimed at enhancing the quality of service parameters. The UAVs’ link quality, residual energy, distance, neighboring nodes’ degree, movement direction, and relative velocity are the fuzzy system inputs to compute UAV nodes’ utility, forming the most suitable multiple relay nodes in the optimized link state routing protocol. Meanwhile, our approach employs a hierarchical fuzzy structure to address the curse of dimensionality caused by the exponential growth of fuzzy rules. Furthermore, the particle swarm optimization algorithm adjusts the fuzzy membership functions to tackle ambiguity and uncertainty in the UAV environment. We simulate our approach using NS-3 and compare it with traditional methods under varying node densities and mobility models. The simulation outcomes demonstrate that our approach enhances end-to-end delay, packet delivery ratio, network throughput, and energy consumption compared to rival schemes.

View source

Similar papers

Conference Jul 2026

AI-based Mobility and Topology Management in Flying Ad Hoc Networks using Hybrid Bio-Inspired Optimization

The adoption of a new communication paradigm is getting attention in the research world, where Flying Ad Hoc Networks (FANETs) have been deemed a viable approach for supporting coordinated operations of multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in situations characterized by dynamic environments and the absence of infra...

Anshu Vashisth, Gagandeep Kaur, Ruhi Saxena et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Intelligent Matching Algorithm with Density-Based Clustering for UAV Swarm Networking

This paper proposes a novel approach for stable UAV–user device pairing based on matching algorithms, which offer higher throughput and satisfaction and introduces a hierarchical matching game, where user clusters and UAVs are the players in the game.

Le-Yi Kong, Dong Guo, Jia-Qi Xu et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

QEGT-Based Adaptive Routing for Energy-Efficient and Reliable Communication in UAV Swarm Networks

This study proposes an intelligent Q-learning-enhanced Evolutionary Game Theory (QEGT) routing mechanism for USNs that leverages game-theoretic incentives and Q-learning to adaptively select strategies.

Anita Murmu, Saurabh Kumar Srivastava, Nuthan Chingeetham et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Intelligent Cluster Head Selection and Aquila Optimizer Based Multi-Objective Routing (AOMOR) Protocol with Digital Twin Simulation for VANET

The next-generation Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) use Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. This facilitates real-time vehicle-roadside infrastructure communication. However, maintaining stable cluster topologies and guaranteeing consistent Quality of Service is problematic because of VANETs intrinsic high mobility and...

K. Gomathy, C. Nagarani · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

An Optimization of Multiple Route Selection in Flying Ad Hoc Network

Simulation results indicate that HOA-MEPFL-CLCT-RP outperforms existing models in terms of Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), energy efficiency, End-to-End Delay (E2D), and routing overhead.

Shaleena H, Sumangala K · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.