Aug 2026· PLoS ONE· Vol 21, pp. e0355490 - e0355490· 0 citations· 73 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The results suggest that the value of AI in classroom settings may relate not only to learning efficiency, but also to students’ learning experiences, particularly in terms of perceived cognitive and emotional engagement benefits.
Abstract
With the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), the usage of various AI tools by university students to support learning has become increasingly common in classroom settings. Focusing on routine in-class AI usage and learning engagement, this study explores the mediating role of perceived learning engagement benefits in linking students’ AI usage behavior to their attitudes, and investigates whether its mediating effects differ across various dimensions of learning engagement. Based on data from 287 questionnaires, structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis were used to test the proposed hypotheses. The results indicate that in-class AI usage was associated with students’ attitudes both directly and also indirectly by enhancing cognitive engagement and emotional engagement, both of which exhibited comparable mediating effects. In general, the university students exhibited positive attitudes toward in-class AI usage, and these attitudes were positively associated with their perceived learning engagement benefits. These results suggest that the value of AI in classroom settings may relate not only to learning efficiency, but also to students’ learning experiences, particularly in terms of perceived cognitive and emotional engagement benefits. Notably, although in-class AI usage was positively associated with all dimensions of perceived engagement benefits, perceived behavioral engagement benefits showed no significant indirect effect on attitudes. This null finding warrants further exploration in future research.
Quantitative findings highlighted that AI tools were perceived as supportive in reducing peer pressure and promoting deeper revision strategies, but concerns about irrelevant or overly generic feedback pointed to the need for developing students’ critical awareness of AI support.
Ke Liu, Hong Liu· RELC Journal : A Journal of...· 0 citations
A sequential engagement framework in which perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and AI literacy foster cognitive engagement, which in turn enhances communicative engagement and sustained AI use, with AI self-efficacy and openness to AI-mediated communication as moderators.
T. Nguyen, Vinh The Phung· VNU University of Economics...· 0 citations
This mixed-methods survey of students at one Australian university examined whether successful-student identity and student-reported academic achievement were associated with different patterns of generative AI engagement, interpreting this pattern as guarded adoption.
Jason Zagami· International Journal of Edu...· 0 citations
The findings suggest that students' engagement in AI‐supported learning is associated not only with their beliefs about ability development, but also by their positive emotional experiences, which contributes to educational research by offering an integrated explanatory and predictive account of student engagement in A...
Xiaoning Wang, Zixian Hong, Wei Guo· European Journal of Educatio...· 0 citations
Student Experience Impact and General Perceptions were the primary psychological predictors of institutional AI engagement, while gender and School of Education affiliation were the significant demographic predictors.
Fatima Khalifeh, Raúl Santiago, Ramon Palau· International journal of res...· 0 citations
It can be understood that difficulty in AI tutoring is not harmful when it is productive, adaptive and psychologically meaningful, rather, manageable challenge can support deeper engagement, stronger motivation, better retention confidence and sustained AI tutoring use.
Sumit Khanal, Abhijeet Sen Gupta· Australian Journal of Artifi...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.