2026· International journal of advanced engineering and management research· Vol 11, pp. 350-364· 0 citations· 8 references
TL;DR
The Governance Translation Framework (GTF) is introduced, a structured model for transforming technical outputs—such as anomaly alerts, predictive analytics, and performance deviations—into decision-ready intelligence for senior leadership.
Abstract
Modern governance systems increasingly rely on artificial intelligence, real-time sensing, and
event-validated learning to monitor complex operational environments. However, the value of
these systems depends on executives' and boards' ability to interpret technical risk signals and
translate them into governance-relevant insights. This manuscript introduces the Governance
Translation Framework (GTF), a structured model for transforming technical outputs—such as
anomaly alerts, predictive analytics, and performance deviations—into decision-ready
intelligence for senior leadership. The GTF integrates the Adaptive Governance Systems
Framework (AGSF), the AI-Enabled Governance Oversight Model (AIGOM), and the
Governance Maturity Model (GMM) to define how organizations can bridge the gap between
technical complexity and strategic oversight. The framework supports executive
decision-making, strengthens accountability, and enhances organizational resilience by aligning
technical signals with governance priorities, risk thresholds, and institutional objectives. The
framework further establishes governance translation as a critical executive orchestration
capability through which operational intelligence, governance observability, and event-validated
learning are transformed into adaptive board-level decision intelligence across interconnected
socio-technical environments.
The Dual-Governance Framework for AIDriven Post-Merger Decision-Making (DGF-PMD) is proposed, explaining how AI-supported decision intelligence can be governed while preserving human responsibility and organizational control.
Frederic Casagrande· Journal of Business Practice...· 0 citations
This article examines three interconnected dimensions of responsible AI for enterprise modernization: governance infrastructure for accountable AI deployment, algorithmic equity in high-impact decision environments, and the evolving international regulatory landscape shaping enterprise AI governance.
M. Modi· International Journal of Eng...· 0 citations
The review argues that machine learning analytics holds genuine promise for strengthening implementation effectiveness, but that this promise is conditional on the presence of robust accountability structures, adequate institutional capacity, and deliberate attention to the distributive effects of algorithmic decision-...
Akinboyo Samuel Imoleayo, Abdulganiy Olayinka Otesanya, John-Paul Adjadeh· World Journal of Advanced Re...· 0 citations
A governance-centered AI consultancy framework that embeds AI-assisted fiscal analysis directly within institutional budgeting, accountability, and governance-oriented decision-support workflows is proposed, suggesting that governance-aware analytical operationalization can provide measurable value beyond standalone AI...
Examining how artificial intelligence (AI) governance supports sustainable decision-making across organizational contexts in Europe reveals that governance increasingly aligns with formal frameworks through policies, dedicated structures, human oversight and Environmental, Social and Governance oriented indicators, enh...
Fernando Almeida· Journal of Ethics in Entrepr...· 0 citations
The paper designs the Governance to Evidence Responsible AI Framework, which contains six governance control domains: mandate and ownership, data and fairness, model validation, decision orchestration, human accountability and continuous assurance.
Chia-Shan Lee· Academos Journal· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.