This work compares bias expression across photo, storyboard, and comic generation in six T2I models by adapting BBG, a text-based bias evaluation framework, to image generation and finds that photos mainly encode biases through subtle visual cues, while storyboards and comics reveal them more explicitly through event sequencing, character positioning, narrative resolution, and textual elements.
Abstract
Text-to-image (T2I) generation models are increasingly embedded in applications such as media content creation and education, raising concerns about how their outputs may reproduce social biases. Prior work has shown that T2I models exhibit social biases, yet existing evaluations largely focus on a photo generation task. As a result, it remains unclear whether and how such biases manifest in more narrative visual formats, such as storyboards and comics, where characters and events are presented across multiple panels. In this work, we compare bias expression across photo, storyboard, and comic generation in six T2I models by adapting BBG, a text-based bias evaluation framework, to image generation. Our results show that proprietary models generate 25.9% biased outputs in photo generation on average, with biased outputs increasing by 9.6pp in storyboard generation and 18.2pp in comic generation. We also find that photos mainly encode biases through subtle visual cues, while storyboards and comics reveal them more explicitly through event sequencing, character positioning, narrative resolution, and textual elements. These findings show that biases that remain less visible in photo generation may surface in narrative visual formats, highlighting the importance of evaluating T2I systems with diverse visual formats beyond photo generation.
This work shows that, as image generation evolves from isolated outputs to coherent visual narratives, safety must evolve accordingly, from per-image moderation to stateful reasoning over interactions and image relationships.
Text-to-image (T2I) models have achieved remarkable success at faithfully rendering specified objects and attributes, yet their ability to produce visual metaphors, images that convey abstract ideas by combining elements from two distinct domains, remains largely unexamined. To bridge this gap, we introduce VMetaphor-Bench, the first benchmark for evaluating visual metaphor generation in T2I models. It comprises 1,500 visual metaphors curated from real-world creative imagery, organized into three levels and ten categories, with each sample paired with two prompts of differing specificity. For evaluation, we develop a hybrid framework within an MLLM-as-judge paradigm, combining a multiple-choice question (MCQ) based protocol of 9,594 questions across four levels of metaphorical fidelity with a dimension-based scoring protocol along three perceptual dimensions. Extensive evaluation of 11 representative T2I models reveals that even the strongest proprietary models struggle with compositional structuring and cross-domain mapping, key aspects of metaphorical expression, highlighting visual metaphor generation as an important frontier for future T2I research.
Chuer Chen, Zi-Chen Wang, Yi He et al.· 0 citations
Results show that although current models achieve strong semantic adherence and visual quality, they often fail to faithfully capture fine-grained cultural details, particularly for underrepresented regions, rituals, and multimodal cultural cues.
Xian-Jing Han, Yuhan Su, Yang Deng et al.· 2 citations
In recent years, text-to-image (T2I) generation models have made substantial progress, particularly in visual realism and the expression of prompt semantics. However, a key difficulty remains: how to evaluate generated results automatically in a way that is both comprehensive and interpretable, while still being practical for real deployment. To address this issue, this paper proposes a multi-dimensional image quality assessment framework for T2I tasks. The framework examines generated images from five dimensions—text fidelity, perceptual quality, object consistency, relational consistency, and global semantic alignment—and derives a final quality score through normalization and weighted fusion. In terms of methodology, the framework combines Tesseract OCR, perceptual quality analysis based on Laplacian variance and exposure statistics, YOLO object detection, BLIP-based visual question answering, and CLIP image-text similarity, thereby forming a modular evaluation pipeline with diagnostic capability. Experiments on multiple mainstream T2I models and representative prompts show that the proposed method can not only distinguish overall performance differences across models, but also provide interpretable results at the level of individual dimensions.
