Circular Economy and Sustainable Development: Evidence From Green Innovation, Energy Transition, and Green Investment on Ecological Footprint in
G7
Countries
Aug 2026· Sustainable Development· 0 citations· 70 references
Abstract
Achieving sustainable development in advanced economies requires accelerating the transition toward a circular economy while mitigating escalating ecological pressures. Despite growing policy attention, evidence remains limited on the joint effects of green finance, green innovation, municipal waste recycling, energy transition, economic growth, and population on the ecological footprint in the G7 countries during 1995–2023. Using a multivariate quantile‐on‐quantile regression framework, this study captures distributional heterogeneity in the relationships between these determinants and the ecological footprint. The results show that green finance consistently reduces the ecological footprint, with stronger mitigation effects beyond the middle quantiles. In contrast, green innovation and municipal waste recycling show positive effects across most quantiles, while the effect of energy transition is heterogeneous, remaining positive at lower and middle quantiles before becoming slightly negative at the highest quantiles. Economic growth and population also increase the ecological footprint, with the impact of economic growth becoming substantially stronger at higher quantiles. To address potential endogeneity, instrumental variable quantile regression with lagged instruments is employed, and the results remain robust. For managers, the results highlight the importance of directing green finance toward projects with demonstrable environmental benefits while systematically evaluating the environmental performance of innovation, recycling, and energy transition initiatives to ensure that circular economy investments translate into lower ecological pressure. By revealing how the effects of circular economy drivers vary across ecological footprint regimes, this study provides targeted guidance for policymakers and business leaders seeking to strengthen long‐term ecological sustainability and advance the Sustainable Development Goals.
Understanding how globalization, energy transition, and resource dependence shape environmental pressure remains critical for resource-rich economies seeking sustainable development. This study investigates the determinants of ecological footprint per capita in the United Arab Emirates from 1992Q1 to 2020Q4 by extendin...
The purpose of this study is to investigate how green innovation, energy system transformation, governance quality, sustainable consumption and digital consumption jointly shape ecological footprints in OECD economies. By using a dynamic panel framework, the study aims to capture the persistence of environmental pr...
Muhammad Rizwanullah, M. Nasrullah, Rachel Bayisenge· International Journal of Cli...· 0 citations
Many current studies have purely regarded green finance as green credit, ignoring the background of carbon neutrality and energy transition. This paper investigates the relationships among green finance, green technological innovation, and urban ecological welfare performance. Using 279 Chinese cities as examples, this...
This study examines the relationship between green industrial policy, climate change, and structural transformation in emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs) amid rising geoeconomic fragmentation. Using panel data from 85–95 EMDEs for 2013–2025, it develops a Green Structural Transformation Index (GSTI) and a...
Ibad ur Rahman, Faisal Ijaz, Atoofa Kalsoom et al.· Inverge Journal of Social Sc...· 0 citations
Mitigating the ecological footprint is essential for attaining global environmental sustainability, driving significant research into the factors that shape this broad measure of human demand on natural resources. Although previous studies have identified multiple determinants of ecological footprint, the combined ef...