Skip to content
Open access

Physical feasibility gating in early drug discovery: a decision framework for identifying predictable physical failures, with retrospective illustration

Jul 2026 · Frontiers in Drug Discovery · Vol 6 · 0 citations · 46 references

TL;DR

A systematic evaluation of thermodynamic, kinetic, transport, transport, and microenvironmental constraints can identify candidates likely to fail on physical grounds prior to substantial investment in synthesis and translational research, thereby conserving resources for the inherently experimental validation of biological hypotheses.

Abstract

Clinical drug development is characterized by high attrition rates: approximately 90% of candidates entering Phase I fail to obtain approval. Inadequate efficacy accounts for 40 to 50 percent of terminations in Phase II and Phase III, while safety concerns account for roughly 30 percent. Most efficacy failures result from incorrect biological hypotheses rather than physicochemical deficiencies: drugs frequently bind their intended targets but fail to alter disease progression because the mechanistic assumptions underlying their action are invalid. This perspective introduces a feasibility-gating framework that utilizes physical constraints as explicit, early-stage filters. The framework does not claim that physics alone can predict therapeutic success; rather, it asserts that a systematic evaluation of thermodynamic, kinetic, transport, and microenvironmental constraints can identify candidates likely to fail on physical grounds prior to substantial investment in synthesis and translational research, thereby conserving resources for the inherently experimental validation of biological hypotheses. The individual constraints are based on well-established pharmacological principles; their contribution lies in organizing these principles into a checklist-style decision logic with specific thresholds, explicit guidance on interpreting each threshold, and a clear connection to quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. We position this framework relative to these established quantitative disciplines, implement each gating criterion, and demonstrate the logic retrospectively using documented development histories. Physical reasoning serves as an essential yet limited filter: it identifies certain predictable physical risks early in the development process without guaranteeing success for candidates that pass through.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Aug 2026

Evidence-constrained mechanistic synthesis for drug discovery

Evidence-constrained mechanistic synthesis (ECMS), a framework that classifies what information each finding contains and converts only that information into restrictions on a family of mechanistic hypotheses, is developed for the pre-calibration stage of drug development.

Dipayan Sengupta, Saumya Panda · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Conformal Prediction for Molecular Properties under Label Shift

This work addresses one of the most pervasive obstacles to applying AI in real-world drug development by addressing conformal prediction framework tailored to label shift by weighting conformal scores using marginal label probability ratios and enhancing the trustworthiness of AI-driven predictions.

Hyeonsu Lee, Juyeong Kim, Erkhembayar Jadamba et al. · 1 citation
Review Open access Aug 2026

Closing the Translational Gap: Closed‐Loop AI Discovery Frameworks for Experimental Validation and Clinical Implementation in Cancer Therapeutics

It is proposed that the translational potential of AI in oncology is substantially shaped by the rigor of the experimental feedback loops that constrain and refine it, thereby accelerating the delivery of more effective, personalized therapies validated through the complete hierarchy of in vitro assays, in vivo PDX mod...

Tuğba Ören Varol, M. Varol · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Is AI Capable of Real-World Drug Discovery?

Small-molecule drug discovery frequently operates in regimes where slight structural changes have large consequences. These are situations in which current artificial intelligence (AI) methods, trained on mass data, may perform poorly. For a substantial fraction of drug-discovery projects, limited biological understand...

G. McGaughey · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

AI virtual cells for drug discovery and pharmacology.

The resources and modeling advances supporting AI virtual cells' value for mechanism-of-action analysis, efficacy, safety, resistance, and combination studies are reviewed, and evidence requirements for pharmacological use are defined.

Shi-Hang Wang, Yang Zhang, Dong Wang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.