Jul 2026· Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling· Vol 66, pp. 8174-8187· 0 citations· 14 references
Computer ScienceMedicine
TL;DR
AIdex-R2 is proposed, a transformer-based end-to-end framework that performs joint inference of the extinction groups (EGs) and unit cell parameters from sequences of low-angle diffraction reflections, providing a novel perspective and evidence for understanding the "black box" of PXRD indexing.
Abstract
The indexing of powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) for ab initio determination of unknown crystal structures remains challenging for systems with low-symmetry (e.g., triclinic and monoclinic), large unit cell (V > 1000 ų), and nonideal data due to reliance on heuristic methods with limited robustness. Here, we propose AIdex-R2, a transformer-based end-to-end framework that performs joint inference of the extinction groups (EGs) and unit cell parameters from sequences of low-angle diffraction reflections. The model achieves ∼98.5% top-5 accuracy for EG identification and ∼1.44% mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for cell parameter prediction (indexing), with an indexing success rate exceeding ∼90% under extremely realistic perturbations (e.g., zero-shift errors ±0.30°, uncertainty noise ±0.15°, reflection absence n = 4, and impurity reflections n = 2). Large-scale benchmarking shows superior performance over classical algorithms (TREOR, ITO, DICVOL) in both speed/efficiency and accuracy. Through interpretability studies of the internal decision-making mechanism, we confirm that the model adopts a discriminant logic dominated by the first diffraction peak (low 2θ) with dynamic weight allocation, providing a novel perspective and evidence for understanding the "black box" of PXRD indexing.
Crystal structure prediction (CSP) from powder diffraction data is a central challenge in materials chemistry. Machine learning (ML) models show promise, but most are trained on idealized simulated data, limiting reliability on real experiments. Here, we assess real-world behaviour using the previously published deCIFe...
Frederik L. Johansen, A. Sapnik, Erik B. Dam et al.· Digital Discovery· 0 citations
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) is the routine probe of crystalline matter, yet its analysis is the rate-limiting step as laboratories automate acquisition. Deep-learning analyzers excel on simulated patterns and degrade on measured ones. This simulation-to-real gap is structural, not additive: synthetic denoising give...
Shaoguang Wang, Weiyu Guo, Ben Fei et al.· 0 citations
GALAXI decouples the identification task into independent one-versus-all binary classifiers that each specialize in recognizing a single phase, which remains robust to common experimental artifacts, including low impurity phase fractions, small crystallite size, peak shifts, sample displacement, and texture.
Xin-Yang Tong, Ethan Jin, Jia-Hang Xu et al.· 0 citations
This work represents a fully automated pipeline integrating data acquisition, diffractogram generation, image transformation, and large-scale compound identification, highlighting the dependence of the approach on the selected CNN architecture.
Alexandro Itzal Medina Velázquez, A. G. Murillo, V. H. Herrera et al.· Matéria· 0 citations
This work introduces ED-CSP, a machine learning framework that predicts crystal structures from chemical composition, atom count, and multiple detector-plane ED spot sets and establishes a benchmark for generative crystal structure prediction from sparse ED observations and provides a foundation for future transfer to...
This review systematically elaborates how ML models are driving the transformation of XAS data analysis, and provides a comprehensive overview of the key challenges in data‐driven XAS, including the feature engineering of spectra and structures, strategies for solving the “spectra‐to‐structure” Inverse Problem, and Sim...
Melaku Lake Tegegne, Hao-Dong Yao, Li-Yuan Wu et al.· Advanced Intelligent Systems· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.