This comprehensive review systematically examines the evolutionary development of photosensitizer generations, explores synergistic combination strategies integrating PDT with complementary therapeutic modalities, and critically evaluates current clinical applications across common OMLs types.
Abstract
Oral mucosal lesions (OMLs) comprise a diverse group of diseases affecting the oral mucosal tissues. Traditional treatments such as medication, surgery, laser therapy, and cryotherapy often produce significant side effects, including high recurrence rates due to drug resistance-associated recurrence and considerable tissue trauma, leading to unsatisfactory clinical outcomes. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), which uses photosensitizers, light at specific wavelengths, and oxygen to generate cytotoxic effects that induce cell apoptosis and necrosis, cause immunogenic cell death and microcirculation damage, and trigger local immune responses, has emerged as a promising minimally invasive alternative. PDT offers advantages including strong selectivity, minimal invasiveness, high targeting capability, and repeatable administration. However, clinical translation remains constrained by pharmacological barriers including restricted tissue penetration depth of therapeutic light, absence of standardized treatment protocols, and insufficient long-term efficacy data. This comprehensive review systematically examines the evolutionary development of photosensitizer generations, explores synergistic combination strategies integrating PDT with complementary therapeutic modalities, and critically evaluates current clinical applications across common OMLs types. By synthesizing current evidence and identifying knowledge gaps regarding drug-target interactions, this review aims to provide a robust foundation for advancing therapeutic agent development and guiding future research directions in PDT-based management of OMLs.
Overall, PDT combination design should be guided by whether adjunctive agents support or undermine photosensitizer accumulation, oxygen availability, ROS-mediated cytotoxicity, and immune activation, when selected according to mechanistic compatibility.
Ilaf Naser, D. Bartusik-Aebisher, Barbara Smolak et al.· Biomedicines· 1 citation
Although promising preclinical results highlight improved tumor control and antitumor responses, challenges related to safety, biodistribution, and clinical translation remain, challenges related to safety, biodistribution, and clinical translation remain are discussed.
Emilie Lambert, Christophe Nguyen, Sean E. Dunn et al.· Advancement of science· 0 citations
Advancing melanoma photomedicine from bench to bedside requires standardized photophysical dosimetry, systematic evaluation in multicellular three-dimensional (3D) tumor spheroids, and prospective clinical trials defining its role in multimodal dermato-oncology.
F. Russano, L. Dall'Olmo, D. Brugnolo et al.· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
This critical narrative review applies a parameter–exposure state–mechanism–endpoint framework to oncologic PDT and distinguishes spatially restricted primary photochemical injury from downstream multicellular effects and appraises the evidentiary thresholds for immunogenic cell death (ICD) and systemic immune claims.
Xuewu Zhang, Xujia Wang, Cheng-Bo Zhang et al.· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
No detectable ROS generation or tumor cell cytotoxicity in vitro is observed using luciferase-engineered tumor-associated macrophages and verteporfin, and complementary Monte Carlo simulations show that achievable photon fluxes are several orders of magnitude below established thresholds for cytotoxic PDT.
Ji Tae Park, Sudip Timilsina, Rebecca C. Harman et al.· Photochemistry and Photobiol...· 0 citations