This work integrated genome-wide profiles of CTCF, H3K27ac, H3K9ac, H3K27me3, and H3K9me3 at 1-kb resolution to generate a unified representation of chromatin organization in human cells and identifies distinct chromatin-state classes that organize the human epigenome.
Abstract
The coordinated activities of histone modifications and chromatin-associated proteins establish chromatin states that regulate genome function and cellular identity. However, the organizational principles that distinguish chromatin states across cell types remain incompletely understood. Here, we integrated genome-wide profiles of CTCF, H3K27ac, H3K9ac, H3K27me3, and H3K9me3 at 1-kb resolution to generate a unified representation of chromatin organization in human cells. Unsupervised embedding resolved five principal chromatin states corresponding to constitutive heterochromatin, CTCF-associated architectural chromatin, transcriptionally active chromatin, mixed repressive chromatin, and Polycomb-associated chromatin. Comparative analyses of HCT116 and K562 cells revealed that cell-type-specific epigenomic differences arise predominantly through remodeling of Polycomb-associated chromatin, whereas the remaining chromatin states exhibit broadly similar epigenomic signatures and comparatively limited remodeling. Consistent with this observation, principal component analysis identified H3K27me3 as the primary contributor to genome-wide epigenomic divergence, whereas CTCF represented a secondary contributor. Integration with Hi-C data further demonstrated that CTCF-associated chromatin is strongly enriched at chromatin loop anchors and other local architectural features, linking chromatin-state organization to three-dimensional genome architecture. Together, our findings identify distinct chromatin-state classes that organize the human epigenome and reveal Polycomb-associated chromatin as a key determinant of cell-type-specific epigenomic differences.
The findings uncover a non-canonical mechanism whereby a chromatin remodeler regulates transcription primarily through three-dimensional genome organization rather than local accessibility control, and establish histone modification-guided chromatin remodeling as a key principle in gene regulation.
Ming Yu, Jingdong Xue, Qi Zhang et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
The six-residue loop 2 of H2A and H2A is used to map, at single-residue resolution, how nucleosome-core variation reshapes cellular function, and identifies histone variation as a source of phenotypic innovation.
Zachary H. Harvey, Benjamin Gundinger, Jian-Yi Kok et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Deep whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data from blood samples of 120 healthy donors revealed only limited association between age-associated epigenetic alterations in DNA methylation, chromatin accessibility, and histone modifications, arguing against a broadly coordinated remodeling of the aging epigenome.
M. Steiger, René Krüger, Mina Shaigan et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
A combinatorial indexing ChIP-seq method is developed to simultaneously profile specific hPTMs across diverse eukaryotic lineages, suggesting that while core hPTMs are ancient and broadly conserved, their functional readout has diversified throughout eukaryotic evolution, shaping lineage-specific chromatin landscapes.
Cristina Navarrete, Sean A. Montgomery, Julen Mendieta et al.· bioRxiv· 11 citations· ⚡4
An innovative approach is applied, direct visualisation of native chromatin structure and its modulation by different factors using cryo-electron tomography, exploiting the inactive X chromosome in differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells as a model system of facultative heterochromatin to illuminate the multiscale o...
Jeongyoon Choi, Dimitrios Bellos, Joseph S. Bowness et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
This chapter outlines the principles and experimental workflow of ChIPmentation, including crosslinking, chromatin fragmentation, immunoprecipitation, tagmentation, library preparation, sequencing, and data analysis, and discusses computational strategies for processing and analyzing ChIPmentation data.
Amalanandan Johna, Sreedarsanam Sreya, Sengupta Tiyas et al.· Methods in Enzymology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.