This article addresses the “abyss of responsibility” in the Anthropocene, where accountability for climate change is routinely outsourced to institutions. By analyzing a global consumer society that reduces both humans and nature to mere commodities, this study develops a Jewish ethical framework for individual and collective ecological agency. Methodologically, it expands the tort liabilities of Seder Nezikin (Mishnayot)—originally addressing unintentional, successive, and shared damages—into a blueprint for systemic environmental accountability. To animate this legal structure, the paper puts rabbinic sources into conversation with modern Jewish thinkers. It utilizes Emmanuel Levinas’s concept of infinite responsibility, Rabbi Jonathan Sacks’s covenantal politics, and Rav Joseph Ber Soloveitchik’s account of a co-responsibility between the human and earth to shift accountability from the state to the individual, calling for moral agency and active citizenship. Crucially, the study argues that environmental and human spheres are deeply intertwined; as long as human suffering is ignored for economic profit, nature will remain exploited. By integrating the legal principles of Nezikin, the inescapable responsibility of Levinas, Sacks’ politics of hope, and earth’s sensitivity towards sinfulness as formulated by Soloveitchik, this paper provides actionable theological resources to democratize responsibility and mend a world in distress.
This paper argues that Sacks’ approach to the environmental crisis is deeply interwoven with his critique of the individualistic society that erodes a shared sense of morality. Against this cultural climate change, the shift from “we” to “I,” he mobilises the collective powers of covenant, hope, and responsibility. By...
For millennia, African moral traditions have shaped how human beings relate to the non-human world. This article engages relational ontologies, communitarian ethics and Achille Mbembe’s notion of the ‘Earthly Community’ to argue that African environmental ethics is not a cultural alternative to Western frameworks but a...
A. Diouf· Pluriversal International Re...· 0 citations
Contemporary Islamic environmental discourse frequently presents stewardship as the primary Qur’anic foundation for ecological responsibility, yet this formulation often leaves unresolved questions concerning anthropocentrism, unequal climate burdens, nonhuman value, and institutional accountability. This study critica...
Aisyah Nur, Mei Arina Ilmi As, Muhammad Rizqi Siregar et al.· Islamicate Futures: Knowledg...· 1 citation
The plethora of injustices occurring worldwide within the relational dimension requires immediate attention from all stakeholders. This study aims to identify solutions from the prophetic Sunnah for addressing relational injustice within human relationships, animals, and the environment, in contemporary settings. This...
Juliyana Junaidi, L. A. Majid, Maisarah Saidin· Global Journal Al-Thaqafah· 0 citations
Contemporary ecological crisis persists despite decades of environmental ethics discourse and rising public awareness, a discrepancy researchers have named the awareness-action gap. One influential corrective, running from Aldo Leopold’s land ethic through Arne Naess’s deep ecology, addresses anthropocentric domination...
Khodadad Azizi, Naupal Asnawi, A. Gina et al.· International Review of Huma...· 0 citations
This paper begins from a moral question arising within a carceral context: how one can make good choices when only bad options seem available. Drawing on that lived experience, it argues that the prison industrial complex constricts not only bodies but the moral imagination itself. Contemporary carceral systems, especi...
H. Spaulding· Studies in Christian Ethics· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.