Jul 2026· Global Policy· Vol 17, pp. 553-565· 0 citations· 22 references
Abstract
This article examines how institutional time horizons shape the long‐term survival prospects of human technological civilisation. While research on global catastrophic and existential risks has expanded, the temporal structures of political‐economic institutions remain underexamined. Using the Fermi paradox as a heuristic lens, I argue that the capacity of complex technological societies to sustain long‐term, risk‐minimising and cooperative action represents a civilisational bottleneck. The challenge of organising extended temporal responsibility raises fundamental questions for political economy and international relations. From this perspective, the article considers the institutional conditions required for a cooperative global order capable of safeguarding humanity's future and the flourishing of life. It explores pathways to extend collective time horizons globally, including strengthened long‐term governance frameworks, mechanisms for intergenerational representation and integrated forms of global political authority. The intertwining of questions, for example, through discounting and justice, suggests that new umbrella concepts are needed to translate such analysis into concrete policy or institutional design. The article concludes by discussing ‘temporal socialism’ and processual ‘world statehood’ as demanding yet viable concepts for institutionalising longer‐term policy orientation of the world system.
The modern world is marked by a paradox. The values that once defined its normative horizon, such as human dignity, autonomy, critical rationality, and the moral equality of all people, are increasingly invoked as universal achievements, yet they are simultaneously challenged, hollowed out, and strategically instrume...
What can we learn from the fundamental nature of the universe? And how might such learning shape our understanding of the human self and our ethical responsibilities in a rapidly developing world? This article brings into conversation three domains that are often treated separately: contemporary cosmology, philosophica...
Chris Jones· Journal of Interdisciplinary...· 0 citations
This article develops a longue durée world-systems account of the contemporary resurgence of the far right. Against interpretations that treat far-right politics as an anomaly or a contingent product of authoritarian leaders, we argue that it has recurrently emerged during moments of world hegemonic crisis, when crises...
Şefika Kumral, Ş. S. Karataşlı· Journal of World-Systems Res...· 0 citations
Over the past two decades, calls for Global, post-Western and relational reincarnations of International Relations (IR) have elevated culture, civilization and cosmology as resources for decentring Eurocentric canons and pluralizing theoretical vocabulary. Culture, however, is not self-explanatory. It is better underst...
Emilian R. Kavalski, Maximilian Mayer· Pluriversal International Re...· 0 citations
This paper develops a conceptual perspective on how a series of major crises, from the “war on terror” (2001) to today's wave of budgetary austerity measures, has created a widespread sense of perpetual emergency among political leaders. Through a habituation effect, prolonged exposure to crisis-driven exceptional meas...
Cătălin-Valentin Raiu· International Review of Admi...· 0 citations
Solar radiation modification (SRM) has become a focus of climate research and governance debate. While much of the governance literature addresses scientific assessment, responsible research, participation, and multilateral oversight, less attention has been paid to how civil society actors shape what counts as legitim...
J. Guivant, M. Carabajal, Eduardo Viola et al.· Environmental Research: Clim...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.