What can we learn from the fundamental nature of the universe? And how might such learning shape our understanding of the human self and our ethical responsibilities in a rapidly developing world? This article brings into conversation three domains that are often treated separately: contemporary cosmology, philosophical anthropology, and moral philosophy. It argues that recent debates about the structure and fate of the universe, reflections on the complexity of the human ‘I’ and an ethics of responsibility developed for bioethical contexts together suggest a unifying insight: reality is dynamic, relational and open-ended. If this is so, then our lives – individually and collectively – ought to be organised in accordance with patterns of renewal, interdependence and accountable action oriented towards the future. The argument is not that cosmology determines morality, but that patterns disclosed in contemporary understandings of reality may illuminate ethical orientations adequate to a dynamic and relational world. The article contributes to interdisciplinary understandings of human agency and responsibility by demonstrating how contemporary cosmology, accounts of the complex self, and an ethics of responsibility can be integrated into a coherent conceptual framework for interpreting human existence within an evolving and relational reality. It argues that responsibility is best conceived as reflective participation within interconnected and evolving systems, thereby offering a conceptual basis for ethical decision-making that is attentive to complexity, uncertainty and the long-term consequences of human action.
When, if ever, is it permissible to afford special consideration to friends and family? How can we strive to be objective in our thinking, and is this always a feasible or appropriate aim?
This book examines the categories of impartiality and objectivity by showing how they frame certain debates in epistemology, moral...
The escalating global environmental crisis has encouraged renewed attention to religious perspectives on the relationship between humans and the natural world. Within Islamic environmental ethics, stewardship has often been used to explain human responsibility towards creation, yet this approach can retain an anthropoc...
Mohd Sualh, Talha Bin Tariq, M. Umar· Journal of Green Economy and...· 0 citations
Growing alarm over the harm done by humans to the natural world, and even to the viability of our own industrial civilization, compels us to ask the deeper moral question: What should be the human relationship to nature? Matthew R. Foster starts by assessing three contrasting patterns of moral reasoning: the Progress E...
For millennia, African moral traditions have shaped how human beings relate to the non-human world. This article engages relational ontologies, communitarian ethics and Achille Mbembe’s notion of the ‘Earthly Community’ to argue that African environmental ethics is not a cultural alternative to Western frameworks but a...
A. Diouf· Pluriversal International Re...· 0 citations
This paper reconceptualizes free will as a concept that evolved culturally as a justification for our moral practices. Such a justification becomes relevant when people consider the possibility that human behaviour results from causes rather than reasons. Such a causal story might imply that our actions lie beyond ou...
Stefaan Blancke, M. Sie· Journal of Cognition and Cul...· 0 citations
In a world in which one can hardly keep track of the developments in AI, even less so the impacts it is having in our world and our lives, it is quite easy to take for granted a series of assumptions – ethical, political, metaphysical etc. – on how to approach the problem of AI, taking the concerns and principles expre...
Lucas Nascimento Machado· Journal of Ethics and Emergi...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.