Aug 2026· Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies· 0 citations· 1 references
Abstract
In a world in which one can hardly keep track of the developments in AI, even less so the impacts it is having in our world and our lives, it is quite easy to take for granted a series of assumptions – ethical, political, metaphysical etc. – on how to approach the problem of AI, taking the concerns and principles expressed by such assumptions to be universally shared. In this context, it becomes particularly important to question this presumed universality, showing that, quite often, the discussion around AI is dominated by philosophical notions, principles and values that are the expression not of a universal humanity, but rather of specific cultures, and gain prominence not due to their presumed universality, but to the geopolitical position these cultures have and the prevalence this gives them in the context of AI development and debate.
With this in mind, a book such as the Handbook of Global Philosophies on AI Ethics, edited by Naresh Singh and Ram B. Ramachandran, is a very welcome initiative, as it purports precisely to tackle over this issue, reminding us, as noted by the Foreword from Thomas Koulopoulow, that “we like to think of ethics and values as universal, but that is more of a comforting myth than a reality” (p. xi). In our review, we will thus not only present a brief overview of the book, but also a critical analysis of some of the main ideas presented in it, as well as how successful the book effectively is in contributing to show “how different philosophical traditions can help us navigate the ethical challenges of AI development with wisdom, nuance and genuine respect for human diversity”.
It is argued that there exists a dialectical tension between particular and contingent AI ethics and universalist AI-related social equity, and that particular and contingent AI ethical frameworks change and evolve precisely because they are not capable of advancing social equity without undermining their very premises...
Aysan Bashirpour Bonab, I. Rudko· Philosophy & Technology· 0 citations
What can we learn from the fundamental nature of the universe? And how might such learning shape our understanding of the human self and our ethical responsibilities in a rapidly developing world? This article brings into conversation three domains that are often treated separately: contemporary cosmology, philosophica...
Chris Jones· Journal of Interdisciplinary...· 0 citations
In order to live well in an AI-based society, designing technically ethical systems, in the spirit of consequentialism, is not enough; rather, it is essential to cultivate citizens who, as AI users, are endowed with virtues and, first and foremost, the virtue of prudence.
Josep Del-Hierro-Dies, J. Sánchez-Cañizares· Scientia et Fides· 0 citations
In 1982, Stephen Toulmin famously argued that medicine “saved the life of ethics.” This article asks whether AI is now doing something similar—and finds that the answer splits. Working from a broadly Toulminian conception of ethics as a discipline that responds to societal demand for normative orientation by providing...
Contemporary analytic philosophy abounds with invocations of something called ‘the world’ (or ‘reality’); but it is none too clear what is meant by ‘the world’ in those invocations. This book shows that in case after case—ranging from the metaphysics of magnitudes, through cognitive science, epistemology, and the phi...
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into various aspects of society has raised pressing ethical concerns, from privacy and fairness to autonomy and safety. In response, the field of AI ethics has grown significantly, with a particular focus on developing guidelines to support the responsible developme...
Astrid Schomäcker, Timo Speith, Luca Deck et al.· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.