Skip to content
Review Open access

SNP Detection Strategies in Genomic Research: A Comparative Review of Major Tools, Algorithms, Challenges and Applications

Jul 2026 · Nepal Journal of Biotechnology · Vol 14, pp. 85-98 · 0 citations

TL;DR

This review compares SNP detection programs such as GATK, BCFtools, FreeBayes, SAMtools, SAMtools, and DeepVariant and their algorithmic structures, namely pileup- based, haplotype-based, and machine-learning approaches and suggests that no single tool is the best.

Abstract

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), representing the most frequent form of genetic variation, serve as essential biomarkers for mapping complex traits, tracing evolutionary lineages, and identifying the genetic basis of disease susceptibility. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables large-scale SNP discovery across diverse organisms, yet accurate detection remains challenging due to sequencing errors, genome complexity, reference bias, and coverage depth. This narrative/comparative review synthesizes primary tool publications, benchmarking studies, and recent literature identified from PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and official software documentation. This review compares SNP detection programs such as GATK, BCFtools, FreeBayes, SAMtools, and DeepVariant and their algorithmic structures, namely pileup- based, haplotype-based, and machine-learning approaches. In general, the comparison suggests that no single tool is the best, as the performance of these tools largely depends on the organism type and genome complexity, sequencing platform, sequencing depth, type of variant, and computational resources. GATK is sensitive and precise among the detection tools reviewed, yet computationally intensive; BCFtools is fast and versatile for non-human datasets; FreeBayes is a high-precision tool for haplotype-based and multiallelic variants; SAMtools is a powerful and stable tool for low-coverage data; and DeepVariant achieves high precision through deep learning architectures but at a high computational cost. We address important hurdles in SNP detection, such as polyploidy, heterozygosity, and repetitive regions, alongside the emerging necessity of Pangenomic Equity, defined here as the use of diverse pangenome references to reduce ancestry-related reference bias in SNP discovery. Lastly, we discuss emerging developments, including artificial intelligence-based variant calling, transformer-based models, graph-based reference genomes, and pangenome-aware methods that help to overcome the limitations of linear genomic models. Therefore, this review summarizes the key considerations for tool selection and outlines future directions for robust and inclusive SNP discovery in genomic research.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Pangenomes aid accurate detection of large insertions and deletions from targeted sequencing: the case of cardiomyopathies

Gene panels represent a widely used strategy for genetic testing in a vast range of Mendelian disorders. While this approach aids reliable bioinformatic detection of short coding variants, it often fails to detect many larger variants. Recent studies have recommended the adoption of pangenome references (as opposed to linear reference genomes like GRCh38) to augment detection of large variants from targeted sequencing, potentially providing diagnostic laboratories with the possibility to streamline diagnostic work-ups and reduce costs. Here, we analyze 1969 cardiomyopathy cases and 1805 controls sequenced with the Illumina Trusight Cardio panel using a pangenome-based workflow (GRAF) and five conventional orthogonal methodologies (GATK HaplotypeCaller, GATK-gCNV, ExomeDepth, Manta and Lumpy-SV) to detect variants ≥ 20 bp in size. Following lab-based variant validation by means of PCR and Sanger sequencing, we show that GRAF conjugates higher precision and recall (F1 score 0.86) compared with other methods (F1 0-0.57) in detecting potentially pathogenic variants ≥ 20 bp from short-read panel data. Results were complemented by a comparison of the tools’ performance in detecting ground truth variants on reference sample HG002 from Genome In A Bottle, which confirmed GRAF to outperform other tools also on exome sequencing (F1 0.97 vs. 0-0.94). Notably, in the HG002 benchmark dataset, GRAF also showed slightly improved performance compared to GATK HaplotypeCaller in the identification of small variants (1–19 bp; F1 0.975 vs. 0.968). Our results indicate that pangenome-based workflows aid improved detection of large variants from targeted sequencing data in the clinical context and suggest that they may contribute to more unified variant detection frameworks for all-size genetic variants in the future.

F. Mazzarotto, Özem Kalay, E. Arslan et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

SNPoptimizer: a scalable genetic-algorithm framework to derive minimal discriminatory SNP panels from large genotyping datasets

The ability to efficiently discriminate genotypes is a critical step in genomics-assisted breeding, population genomics, biodiversity studies, traceability along food chains, and germplasm management. However, identifying the minimal and most informative subset of SNPs capable of uniquely distinguishing a large set of individuals remains a computationally challenging task. Here, we present SNPoptimizer, a user-friendly Shiny application that uses a genetic algorithm–based framework to optimally select discriminatory SNPs from large-scale genotyping datasets. By leveraging the evolutionary principles of selection, mutation, and crossover, SNPoptimizer iteratively identifies compact SNP panels that maximize genotype resolution. The application supports HapMap-formatted and VCF genotype files and includes an optional second-round optimization for resolving putative duplicates. We benchmarked SNPoptimizer across three independent datasets, including a tomato diversity panel, 820 Cauliflower genotypes, and a soybean diversity panel comprising 30 million variants across 1,511 samples. Across the three datasets, panels of 17–22 SNPs yielded R-VDP values ranging from 0.8744 to 0.9973, with complete discrimination obtained in Dataset III, demonstrating robust performance across different datasets. Cross-tool comparisons revealed complementary trade-offs among discriminatory power, panel size, runtime, and run-to-run reliability. SNPoptimizer provides a flexible solution for researchers seeking to reduce genotyping costs while maintaining high discriminative power.

Salvatore Esposito, Nicola Scalzi, S. Palombieri et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

PanvaR: An R package for fine-mapping and visualizing results from genome-wide association studies

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) use statistical models to correlate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to a phenotype of interest. This scan of the entire genome identifies regions of association with a phenotype, but due to linkage disequilibrium (LD), GWAS on their own cannot identify single genes responsible for phenotypic variation. Rather, fine-mapping of GWAS regions is required, necessitating the use of additional tools and software. With the introduction of more pangenomic resources in a number of crops (Guo et al. 2025; Hufford et al. 2021), the fidelity of these fine-mapping efforts is growing, presenting the opportunity to leverage new information about allelic variation towards gene discovery (Shi et al. 2023; Della Coletta et al. 2021). Panvar is a tool developed to integrate existing software and resources to perform GWAS and fine-mapping in one seamless step. For each identified GWAS peak, panvaR outputs information about LD and SNP effect prediction for each SNP and by layering locations of nearby genes, creates a refined list of possible candidate genes. We have implemented Panvar as an R package, “panvaR”, which runs the analysis functions, creates interactive and static visualizations, and outputs results tables. This tool seeks to bridge the gap between GWAS and gene speeding up an important step of quantitative genetic studies.

Collin Luebbert, Rijan R. Dhakal, Phillip Ozersky et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

A high-resolution human pangenome structural variant resource for improved disease association

Long-read sequencing (LRS) and diploid genome assembly have enabled nearly complete structural variant (SV) discovery. Using 293 nearly complete genomes, we characterize the full spectrum of genetic variation and show that while 99% of the variants between any two genomes are single base-pair substitutions, 88% of the euchromatic variant base pairs are SVs, including insertions, deletions, duplications, and inversions. We identify 24 gene-rich regions subject to megabase-scale variation, 2,293 potentially unstable tandem repeats, and 890 novel expression quantitative trait loci associated with SVs in humans. Expanding to 1,218 LRS samples from the 1000 Genomes Project and applying a newly developed cross-platform breakpoint evaluation tool, BoostSV, we construct a nonredundant callset comprising 614,522 SVs. We demonstrate the utility of this population-level SV reference callset by filtering >99% of the common variation from 44 unsolved LRS probands from the Undiagnosed Diseases Network to discover likely disease-causing SVs. Second, we genotype 1,053 high-impact biallelic SVs from the pangenome callset in 232,090 samples from All of Us and discover 105 SVs with significant associations, including 26% where the SV is the lead variant. This publicly available pangenome SV resource will drive new disease associations and further our understanding of the missing heritability of human genetic disease.

J. Lin, J. Gustafson, J. Wertz et al. · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Genomic language models (gLMs): Emerging applications, challenges, and future directions in computational genomics.

Across the included studies, stronger evidence for gLM utility was generally associated with biologically informed or task-aligned model design, including evolutionary alignments, motif-aware objectives, long-context architectures, RNA structural priors, population-aware representations, and domain-specific pretraining.

Mahinaz A. Mashhour, Manal Abdel Wahed, Mai S. Mabrouk · 0 citations