Quantum-enhanced generative artificial intelligence: a critical review of classical limitations, complexity barriers, and hybrid quantum–classical architectures
TL;DR
It is concluded that quantum utility is unlikely to lie in tasks involving natural language processing under current architectures, but rather in certain computational subroutines of quantum-mechanical spaces of quantum-mechanical spaces.
Abstract
The rapid commercialization of generative artificial intelligence (AI), along with the maturation of quantum technologies has raised a question: can quantum-powered neural networks become the next major shift in large language model (LLM) technology? This naturally leads to another misconception that quantum systems will replace classical LLMs. In this study, both architectures are compared in a contrastive manner in terms of mathematics. The data reveals that identical dynamics that help classical systems learn natural language distributions constrain its ability to use efficient sampling of quantum-mechanical spaces. Performing complexity-theoretic separations (i.e., the widely believed but unproven conjecture that BPP ⊆ BQP) and a 2025 preprint reporting experimental demonstrations of quantum advantage for generative tasks we conclude that quantum utility is unlikely to lie in tasks involving natural language processing under current architectures, but rather in certain computational subroutines. We then suggest a hybrid quantum-classical architecture as the best direction to take in the future, as it has the advantages of both paradigms. This is done by studying a case study that optimizes retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines with Grover's search algorithm.