The role of explainability in AI and ML is examined across diverse scientific fields, including medicine, psychology, geology, education, and public policy to better understand the technical and theoretical aspects that hinder explainability in general and specifically for each research domain and map how these can be overcome.
Abstract
Aim/Purpose
This paper examines the role of explainability in AI and ML across diverse scientific fields, including medicine, psychology, geology, education, and public policy.
Background
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) are transforming various scientific disciplines, offering powerful tools for prediction, analysis, and decision-making. However, the complexity of these models often makes them opaque, limiting their utility in high-stakes domains.
Methodology
We selectively sample pivotal domain-specific and cross-disciplinary literature to isolate, contrast, and critique the socio-technical challenges of Explainable AI across five distinct fields of practice.
Contribution
This paper contributes awareness to the critical role of explainability of AI as it is getting integrated into every domain of life.
Findings
Transparency and explainability of AI have different roles in different fields of research. Despite the different roles, explainability is critical to the trust in the results and to enable further scientific advancement.
Recommendations for Practitioners
Practitioners must reject high-level platitudes and deploy domain-specific operational playbooks – such as embedding visual saliency maps in clinical medicine or physical constraints in geosciences – to anchor AI systems in human-centered accountability.
Recommendations for Researchers
Researchers should empirically investigate human-grounded evaluation metrics and adversarial vulnerabilities to mapping tools, moving past generic post-hoc explanations toward context-sensitive, contestable architectures.
Impact on Society
Researchers should empirically investigate human-grounded evaluation metrics and adversarial vulnerabilities to mapping tools, moving past generic post-hoc explanations toward context-sensitive, contestable architectures.
Future Research It is important to better understand the technical and theoretical aspects that hinder explainability in general and specifically for each research domain and map how these can be overcome.
A methodology is advanced to embed explainability in the AI decision-making process, starting from data preprocessing to generating explanations and human evaluation, and the results highlight the potential of explainability to enhance human comprehension and foster responsible use of AI systems in high-stakes decision...
Mahabala H. N.· International Journal of Mod...· 0 citations
Experimental findings show the effectiveness of XAI techniques to enhance interpretability without causing a major loss in predictive accuracy and the practical implications, limitations, and research directions on the future of explainable and trustworthy AI systems.
Unknown authors· International Journal of App...· 0 citations
A framework through XAI to incorporate various health data sources such as electronic health records, medical imaging, laboratory reports, and wearable sensor information, which can be integrated in the context of achieving higher predictive performance in disease prediction and treatment stratification, as well as dec...
M. Aparna, S. Lahane, Dr. Bharti A. Dixit· Journal of Intelligent Decis...· 0 citations
An analytical model is developed that incorporates the defining features of human and machine intelligence, capturing the limited but flexible nature of human cognition with imperfect machine recommendations, and represents how AI-based explanations influence the DM’s belief in the algorithm’s predictive quality.
T. Boyacı, Caner Canyakmaz, Francis de Véricourt· Management Sciences· 0 citations
It is concluded that explainability is a necessary, though not sufficient, condition for trustworthy Al, and concrete directions for future research are outlined, including standardised benchmarks, human-centred evaluation, and explainability for large generative models.
Afna Ashraff M, Archana K, Buthaina Buthaina et al.· International Journal of Tec...· 0 citations
A thorough and stepwise analysis of how XAI was created in current decision systems indicates that explainable models, in addition to increasing interpretability, can also help to improve debugging, bias detection and ethical AI deployment.
Meena Krishnan· International Journal of Mod...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.