Skip to content
Review Open access

A A Scoping Review of Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids for Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease

Jul 2026 · Journal of Clinical and Nursing Research · Vol 10, pp. 210-222 · 0 citations

TL;DR

SDM and PDAs improved patient knowledge, participation, decision quality, and satisfaction, while reducing decisional conflict and negative emotions, while reducing decisional conflict and negative emotions in PAD.

Abstract

Objective: To review the current evidence on shared decision-making (SDM) and patient decision aids (PDAs) for patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), focusing on application characteristics, intervention effects, and implementation factors to inform clinical decision support models. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was performed in eight Chinese and English databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and the China Biomedical Literature Database, up to 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, qualitative studies, and mixed-methods studies. Data were extracted and descriptively synthesized. Results: Fifteen studies published between 2011 and 2025 were included, mainly from Europe, North America, and Asia. Studies explored SDM preferences, the development and application of PDAs, decision support tools, SDM training, multimedia decision-making interventions, and patients’ experiences. SDM and PDAs improved patient knowledge, participation, decision quality, and satisfaction, while reducing decisional conflict and negative emotions. Implementation was affected by time constraints, information complexity, provider–patient communication, and healthcare system factors. Conclusion: SDM and PDA research in PAD is increasing; however, tool standardization and clinical integration remain limited. Future research should develop patient-centered decision-support tools and promote nurse-led SDM models to improve long-term PAD management and patient decision-making experiences.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Impact of Decision Aids for Shared Decision-Making for Patients with Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Overall, Patient Decision Aids were associated with better knowledge, less decisional conflict and greater satisfaction with the decision-making process, and some studies also suggested benefits for women with lower health literacy or socioeconomic status, especially when the aids used pictures or simple language.

S. Sdinami, L. Conti, B. Capetti et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Patient-reported outcomes in studies evaluating shared decision-making interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

This protocol describes a systematic review that will map PROs and synthesise effects by PRO construct, where data permit, and meta-analysis will be performed where studies are sufficiently comparable.

Sang-Ho Yoo, Myonghwa Park, M. J. Kim · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

How nurses contribute to medical treatment decision-making with physicians: a scoping review

A model is developed that illustrates how the interplay between personal, organisational and cultural factors determines whether nurses’ clinically relevant observations are acknowledged and integrated into medical treatment decisions.

V. W, Stoffels M, Kusurkar R. A. et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and clinical decision-making in inflammatory rheumatic conditions: a systematic review

Patient-reported outcome measures capture valuable patient data and show potential to support clinical decision-making, particularly in RA patients, according to a systematic review of online medical literature databases from inception to February 2025.

Jake Grange, J. Prior, Jon Packham et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Shared Decision making aids in palliative care: A systematic review & meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Evidence regarding the effectiveness of decision aids in palliative care decision making is limited and of low overall quality, with observed improvements primarily in patient knowledge and changes in stated treatment preferences rather than established improvements in decision quality or values-concordant care.

J. El Khoury, Rachel Garofalo, Molly M. Kilpatrick et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.