Jul 2026· Journal of Clinical and Nursing Research· Vol 10, pp. 210-222· 0 citations
TL;DR
SDM and PDAs improved patient knowledge, participation, decision quality, and satisfaction, while reducing decisional conflict and negative emotions, while reducing decisional conflict and negative emotions in PAD.
Abstract
Objective: To review the current evidence on shared decision-making (SDM) and patient decision aids (PDAs) for patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), focusing on application characteristics, intervention effects, and implementation factors to inform clinical decision support models. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was performed in eight Chinese and English databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and the China Biomedical Literature Database, up to 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, qualitative studies, and mixed-methods studies. Data were extracted and descriptively synthesized. Results: Fifteen studies published between 2011 and 2025 were included, mainly from Europe, North America, and Asia. Studies explored SDM preferences, the development and application of PDAs, decision support tools, SDM training, multimedia decision-making interventions, and patients’ experiences. SDM and PDAs improved patient knowledge, participation, decision quality, and satisfaction, while reducing decisional conflict and negative emotions. Implementation was affected by time constraints, information complexity, provider–patient communication, and healthcare system factors. Conclusion: SDM and PDA research in PAD is increasing; however, tool standardization and clinical integration remain limited. Future research should develop patient-centered decision-support tools and promote nurse-led SDM models to improve long-term PAD management and patient decision-making experiences.
SDM and PDAs improved patient knowledge, participation, decision quality, and satisfaction, while reducing decisional conflict and negative emotions, while reducing decisional conflict and negative emotions in PAD.
Jiabei Lu, Yue-Xian Tao, Qiuying Lou et al.· 0 citations
Overall, Patient Decision Aids were associated with better knowledge, less decisional conflict and greater satisfaction with the decision-making process, and some studies also suggested benefits for women with lower health literacy or socioeconomic status, especially when the aids used pictures or simple language.
S. Sdinami, L. Conti, B. Capetti et al.· Current Oncology· 0 citations
This protocol describes a systematic review that will map PROs and synthesise effects by PRO construct, where data permit, and meta-analysis will be performed where studies are sufficiently comparable.
Sang-Ho Yoo, Myonghwa Park, M. J. Kim· BMJ Open· 0 citations
A model is developed that illustrates how the interplay between personal, organisational and cultural factors determines whether nurses’ clinically relevant observations are acknowledged and integrated into medical treatment decisions.
V. W, Stoffels M, Kusurkar R. A. et al.· BMJ Open· 0 citations
Patient-reported outcome measures capture valuable patient data and show potential to support clinical decision-making, particularly in RA patients, according to a systematic review of online medical literature databases from inception to February 2025.
Jake Grange, J. Prior, Jon Packham et al.· Rheumatology Advances in Pra...· 0 citations
Evidence regarding the effectiveness of decision aids in palliative care decision making is limited and of low overall quality, with observed improvements primarily in patient knowledge and changes in stated treatment preferences rather than established improvements in decision quality or values-concordant care.
J. El Khoury, Rachel Garofalo, Molly M. Kilpatrick et al.· Palliative Medicine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.