Skip to content
Open access

Clinical performance of a conometric retention system for single implant restorations: 1-year analysis of a prospective multicenter study

Aug 2026 · International Journal of Implant Dentistry · Vol 12 · 0 citations · 40 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The investigated conometric retention system demonstrated high implant and prosthetic survival rates and limited marginal bone changes, however, a clinically relevant incidence of technical complications, including irreversible loss of conometric retention, was observed during the first year of function.

Abstract

Conventional screw- and cement-retained single implant restorations are associated with biological and technical complications. Friction-retained conometric concepts have been proposed as an alternative; however, clinical evidence for single crowns, particularly from prospective multicenter studies, remains limited. This study evaluated the 1-year clinical performance of a conometric retention system for implant-supported single crowns. This prospective multicenter study was conducted at nine clinical centers in Europe and North America. Subjects requiring single-tooth replacement in the maxilla or mandible received one implant restored with a prefabricated 5.9° conometric abutment and a titanium nitride–coated coping. All-ceramic crowns were extraorally bonded and seated without cement or screws. Radiographs were obtained at implant placement, delivery of the permanent restoration, and after 1 year. Primary outcomes were implant and prosthetic survival. Secondary outcomes included marginal bone level (MBL) changes, bleeding on probing, plaque, probing pocket depth, and complication rates. Descriptive statistics and confidence intervals were calculated. A total of 144 implants were included in the per-protocol analysis. Three implants failed after delivery of the permanent restoration, resulting in a 1-year implant survival rate of 96.7%. Of 131 restorations evaluated at 1 year, 4 showed irreversible loss of conometric retention and were classified as prosthetic failures. In total, 22 prosthetic complication events were recorded, including 18 reversible technical complications (12.5%) and 4 irreversible failures, corresponding to an overall complication rate of 15.3%. Mean MBL change was − 0.11 mm from implant placement to PR and − 0.02 mm from PR to 1 year. Within the limitations of this 1-year analysis, the investigated conometric retention system demonstrated high implant and prosthetic survival rates and limited marginal bone changes. However, a clinically relevant incidence of technical complications, including irreversible loss of conometric retention, was observed during the first year of function. These findings suggest that the conometric concept may require careful case selection and clinical monitoring. Long-term follow-up is required to further evaluate the clinical stability and prosthetic reliability of this retention concept over time. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID, NCT04063878, August 20, 2019.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Prospective clinical study to evaluate the survival of two-piece zirconia implants: a single-center study. 36-month results

The 39.1% early failure rate within the first 12 months was followed by stable marginal bone levels through 36 months in implants that achieved successful osseointegration, underlining the need for peri-implant maintenance.

M. Jennes, Z. Mao, Ece Atay et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Peri-Implant Tissue Health and Prosthodontic Outcomes of a Cylindrical-Conical Implant with a Progressive Thread Design at Five-Year Follow-Up: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study

Objectives: We aim to assess the 5-year clinical outcomes of a cylindrical-conical implant system with a progressive thread design and a sandblasted, acid-etched surface and its fixed prostheses under routine clinical conditions. Methods: This retrospective single-center cross-sectional follow-up study included patient...

Jörg-Martin Ruppin, Tobias Graf · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Rehabilitation of the Maxillary Aesthetic Zone with Immediate Bicortical Implants and One Abutment at One Time Protocol: A Prospective Cohort with Fully Digital Workflow

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of guided immediate bicortical implant placement combined with a one-abutment-one-time (OAOT) protocol using prefabricated microgrooved abutments with zirconia crowns (Zircopings) and a fully digital prosthetic workflow in the maxillary aesthetic zone. In th...

V. Nag, Manikandhan Ramanthan, Bhavna Lokwani et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Monolithic Zirconia Versus Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region: 3-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES To compare the clinical, biological, and technical outcomes of posterior three-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (iFDPs) fabricated from monolithic zirconia (MonoZR) or porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM). MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective randomized controlled trial, partially edentulous p...

Aspasia Pachiou, Raphael Singh, Ronald E. Jung et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Survival and complications of tooth- and implant-supported ceramic restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM During oral rehabilitation, clinicians manage various substrates including natural teeth and implants. Biomechanical differences might influence stress distribution within ceramic materials. PURPOSE This systematic review compared the frequency of failures and fracture-related complications of to...

Camila da Silva Rodrigues, Manassés Tercio Vieira Grangeiro, Jatyr Pisani Proença et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.