Skip to content
Open access

Prospective clinical study to evaluate the survival of two-piece zirconia implants: a single-center study. 36-month results

Aug 2026 · International Journal of Implant Dentistry · Vol 12 · 0 citations · 38 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The 39.1% early failure rate within the first 12 months was followed by stable marginal bone levels through 36 months in implants that achieved successful osseointegration, underlining the need for peri-implant maintenance.

Abstract

To evaluate the 36-month survival and clinical outcomes of two-piece zirconia implants restored with screw-retained glass-ceramic crowns on PEKK abutments. This prospective single-center clinical study evaluated implant survival as the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes including peri-implant soft tissue parameters, marginal bone level changes, and patient-reported outcome measures. Twenty-four patients received single CERALOG Hexalobe two-piece zirconia implants manufactured by ceramic injection molding (CIM) in healed sites. After 6-month submerged healing, implants were restored with provisional screw-retained crowns on PEKK abutments, followed by definitive lithium disilicate crowns (IPS e.max Press) on PEKK abutments secured with titanium abutment screws (25 Ncm). Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at implant placement, re-entry, definitive loading, and at 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-ups. Implant survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier estimates. Of 23 evaluable implants, nine failed within the first 12 months: six due to failed osseointegration (two at re-entry, three during provisional restoration, one after definitive loading) and three due to implant fracture (one during provisional restoration, two after definitive loading). Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 60.9% (95% CI; 41–81%) at 12 months. No additional failures occurred between 12 and 36 months. Peri-implant soft tissue parameters of surviving implants showed favorable trends (PPD: 2.7 ± 0.7 mm at 12 months, 2.0 ± 0.5 mm at 24 months, 1.9 ± 0.8 mm at 36 months; BOP: 26%, 21%, and 18%, respectively; MGI: 0.38 ± 0.36 at 12 months, 0.40 ± 0.76 at 24 months, 0.21 ± 0.48 at 36 months). At the implant level, peri-implant mucositis was diagnosed in 7 of 13 implants (53.8%) at 36 months; no peri-implantitis was observed throughout the observation period. Mean DIB was 1.9 ± 0.6 mm at definitive loading, 1.6 ± 0.5 mm at 24 months, and 1.5 ± 0.9 mm at 36 months. One abutment screw loosening at 24 months was successfully managed. Patients with surviving implants reported high satisfaction scores (overall satisfaction: 5.0 ± 0.0 at 36 months). The 39.1% early failure rate within the first 12 months was followed by stable marginal bone levels through 36 months in implants that achieved successful osseointegration. However, peri-implant mucositis remained prevalent at 36 months, underlining the need for peri-implant maintenance. The early post-loading period represents the critical determinant of long-term implant survival in this system. Extended follow-up through 60 months is ongoing.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Clinical performance of a conometric retention system for single implant restorations: 1-year analysis of a prospective multicenter study

The investigated conometric retention system demonstrated high implant and prosthetic survival rates and limited marginal bone changes, however, a clinically relevant incidence of technical complications, including irreversible loss of conometric retention, was observed during the first year of function.

Peter Gehrke, Octavio Weinhold, Pelayo Antuna et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Ceramic Dental Implants: An 11-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

Ceramic implants may represent a viable metal-free treatment option for appropriately selected patients, particularly in esthetically demanding situations, when careful case selection, system-specific training, and adherence to surgical and restorative protocols are applied.

M. Monzavi, Medis Masnavi, Ayman Zraiqat et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Monolithic Zirconia Versus Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region: 3-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES To compare the clinical, biological, and technical outcomes of posterior three-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (iFDPs) fabricated from monolithic zirconia (MonoZR) or porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM). MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective randomized controlled trial, partially edentulous p...

Aspasia Pachiou, Raphael Singh, Ronald E. Jung et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

A prospective randomized split-mouth trial comparing immediate versus early anterior implant placement with customized healing abutments: 12-month marginal bone loss, stability, and esthetic outcome

The clinically meaningful esthetic advantages of IIP support its preferential use in the anterior zone when anatomical conditions permit and when combined with guided protocols and customized healing abutments, IIP and EIP yield comparable 12-month marginal bone outcomes.

Sara N. El Touliani, Ahmed M. Abdel-Hamid, Nada M. H. Fahmy et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

The influence of implant placement depth on peri-implant tissues in immediate implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial with 1-year follow-up.

Immediate implants placed 6 mm below the mid-buccal gingival level showed significantly less short-term marginal bone loss than immediate implants placed 4 mm below the gingiva after a period of 1 year.

Jonas Alkimavicius, Manish Rathi, Ula Linkeviciute et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.