Aug 2026· Journal of Clinical Medicine· Vol 15· 0 citations· 39 references
Medicine
TL;DR
A practical, evidence-based synthesis of Lp(a) biology, contemporary guideline recommendations, integrated risk stratification using PREVENT and CAC, current management, and emerging Lp(a)-targeted therapies for use across primary care and cardiology practice are provided.
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent and causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS), with plasma levels largely genetically determined and minimally influenced by lifestyle. Contemporary dyslipidemia guidelines now recommend at least one lifetime measurement and increasingly incorporate Lp(a) into personalized cardiovascular risk evaluation. Recent guideline updates integrate traditional risk estimation with risk-enhancing factors and coronary artery calcium (CAC) imaging. The 2026 U.S. multi-society guideline classifies Lp(a) ≥ 125 nmol/L as a risk-enhancing factor and ≥250 nmol/L as a major risk enhancer. The PREVENT equations provide baseline risk estimation, personalized by Lp(a) and refined through CAC-based reclassification when treatment decisions remain uncertain. Despite its established role in risk assessment, current management remains indirect and emphasizes aggressive control of modifiable risk factors, particularly low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Emerging Lp(a)-targeted therapies, including antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNA agents, and oral small-molecule inhibitors, have shown substantial and sustained reductions in Lp(a) levels, although definitive evidence of cardiovascular benefit is still pending. This review provides a practical, evidence-based synthesis of Lp(a) biology, contemporary guideline recommendations, integrated risk stratification using PREVENT and CAC, current management, and emerging Lp(a)-targeted therapies for use across primary care and cardiology practice.
Novel unapproved therapies, including an antisense oligonucleotide, small interfering RNAs, and an oral small molecule have demonstrated Lp(a) reductions of up to 99% and are being tested in ongoing cardiovascular outcomes trials to determine whether pharmacologic Lp(a) lowering translates into reduced cardiovascular e...
Yakubu Bene-Alhasan, V. Nambi, Layla A. Abushamat et al.· Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc...· 0 citations
Treatment paradigms emphasize early intensification of therapy and addition of non-statin agents, and polygenic risk scoring and RNA-based therapies may offer opportunities to identify and treat those at highest residual risk.
Andrew Carlson, Zaid A. Zayyad, Stefanie Driesenga et al.· Cardiology and Therapy· 0 citations
This narrative review summarizes the molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, and clinical relevance of Lp(a), and critically examines current and emerging therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing Lp(a)-mediated cardiovascular risk.
L. Granata, Simona Giubilato, Francesca Campanella et al.· Frontiers in Medicine· 1 citation
Emerging evidence links Lp(a) to atrial fi brillation, broadening its clinical relevance and integrating Lp(a) testing into risk assessment and preparing for targeted therapies are critical steps in modern cardiovas-cular prevention.
L. Kopaleishvili, T. Chkhaidze, S. Ungiadze et al.· Bulgarian Cardiology· 0 citations
International recommendations with current Chinese practice are compared, barriers related to infrastructure, safety, education, standardization, and evidence localization are analyzed, and a multimodal implementation framework for residual-risk assessment is proposed.
Ming Chi, Tao-Ming Qian, Ji-Rong Zhang et al.· Frontiers in Medicine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.