Jul 2026· Journal of Functional Biomaterials· Vol 17, pp. 365· 1 citation· 116 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The main conclusion is that progress will depend less on expanding printable geometries alone and more on integrated optimisation of materials, processing windows, structural fidelity, biological validation, quality assurance and translational readiness.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) has expanded the design space of biomaterials for biomedical engineering, enabling patient-specific geometries, controlled porosity, multi-material constructs and cell-compatible fabrication. However, clinical translation remains constrained by a mismatch between fabrication capability and biological, mechanical and regulatory performance. Unlike reviews focused on individual material families, isolated AM routes or specific applications, this review interprets AM of biomaterials as an integrated biomaterial–process–structure–property–translation ecosystem. It examines how material chemistry, feedstock state, printing route, architecture, post-processing and biological response jointly determine the reliability of acellular and cellular constructs, with particular emphasis on clinically relevant performance, reproducibility and long-term safety. Metallic, ceramic, polymeric, hydrogel-based and composite biomaterials are analysed alongside binder jetting (BJ), directed energy deposition (DED), material extrusion (ME) and jetting (MJ), powder bed fusion (PBF), VAT photopolymerisation and bioprinting. The review identifies recurring challenges across routes, including restricted material–process compatibility, limited prediction of process–structure–property relationships, post-processing-induced changes in biological performance, insufficient standardisation of printability and biofunctionality metrics, incomplete validation of cell-laden and vascularised constructs and weak transfer of laboratory protocols to clinically robust workflows. The main conclusion is that progress will depend less on expanding printable geometries alone and more on integrated optimisation of materials, processing windows, structural fidelity, biological validation, quality assurance and translational readiness. This ecosystem-level perspective provides a framework for evaluating limitations and defining future priorities in AM-based biomaterials for regenerative medicine, implants and precision biomedical engineering.
Living organisms solve engineering problems — load-bearing, self-repair, water shedding, adhesion, drag reduction — using a narrow set of raw materials organized with extraordinary precision across scales. This paper synthesizes fourteen peer-reviewed sources (2016–2026) spanning structural biomimetics, green materials...
Aditi Chaudhary· Journal on Materials and its...· 0 citations
Polymer-based three-dimensional (3D) printing has evolved from a prototyping approach toward a manufacturing strategy with emerging clinical relevance for individualized dosage forms, local drug depots, microneedle systems, microfluidic cartridges, biosensor housings and integrated theranostic platforms. Its value aris...
P. Pandian, V. Sethuraman, A. Shukla et al.· Polymers· 0 citations
Additive manufacturing has gained prominence as a powerful platform for fabricating morphologically complex and functionally active biomaterial constructs for biomedical applications. Among biopolymers, silk has been extensively explored owing to its good mechanical properties (tensile strength 300–740 MPa, Young's mod...
Deepali Kadam, M. Aydogdu, Mohan Edirisinghe et al.· Applied Physics Reviews· 0 citations
This review systematically examines material design and polymer network engineering, fabrication strategies, functional regulation, and biomedical applications of HPs, and emphasizes the strategic incorporation of bioactive, conductive, nanostructured, and stimuli‐responsive fillers to transform HPs from passive barrie...
Shape memory polymers (SMPs) have emerged as a distinctive class of functional polymers for tissue engineering and regenerative medical devices because they couple programmable shape transformation with the biological, mechanical, and degradation requirements of regenerating tissue. Unlike conventional static scaffolds...
Personalized medical treatment aims to tailor diagnosis and treatment plans to individual patients, accounting for differences in anatomical structure, gene expression, and lesion microenvironment. Traditional mold‐based manufacturing methods can hardly produce implants that perfectly match unique patient lesions. Th...
Qingbing Wang, Ning Liang, Fengping Zhu et al.· MedComm – Biomaterials and A...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.