Skip to content
Review Open access

Additive Manufacturing of Biomaterials: Integrated Translational Ecosystems, Process–Structure–Property Interactions and Emerging Paradigms for Next-Generation Biomedical Engineering

Jul 2026 · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · Vol 17, pp. 365 · 1 citation · 116 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The main conclusion is that progress will depend less on expanding printable geometries alone and more on integrated optimisation of materials, processing windows, structural fidelity, biological validation, quality assurance and translational readiness.

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) has expanded the design space of biomaterials for biomedical engineering, enabling patient-specific geometries, controlled porosity, multi-material constructs and cell-compatible fabrication. However, clinical translation remains constrained by a mismatch between fabrication capability and biological, mechanical and regulatory performance. Unlike reviews focused on individual material families, isolated AM routes or specific applications, this review interprets AM of biomaterials as an integrated biomaterial–process–structure–property–translation ecosystem. It examines how material chemistry, feedstock state, printing route, architecture, post-processing and biological response jointly determine the reliability of acellular and cellular constructs, with particular emphasis on clinically relevant performance, reproducibility and long-term safety. Metallic, ceramic, polymeric, hydrogel-based and composite biomaterials are analysed alongside binder jetting (BJ), directed energy deposition (DED), material extrusion (ME) and jetting (MJ), powder bed fusion (PBF), VAT photopolymerisation and bioprinting. The review identifies recurring challenges across routes, including restricted material–process compatibility, limited prediction of process–structure–property relationships, post-processing-induced changes in biological performance, insufficient standardisation of printability and biofunctionality metrics, incomplete validation of cell-laden and vascularised constructs and weak transfer of laboratory protocols to clinically robust workflows. The main conclusion is that progress will depend less on expanding printable geometries alone and more on integrated optimisation of materials, processing windows, structural fidelity, biological validation, quality assurance and translational readiness. This ecosystem-level perspective provides a framework for evaluating limitations and defining future priorities in AM-based biomaterials for regenerative medicine, implants and precision biomedical engineering.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Bio-Inspired Materials: Nature-Inspired Design Strategies,Eco-Friendly Synthesis, and Applications in Biomedical and Engineering Domains

Living organisms solve engineering problems — load-bearing, self-repair, water shedding, adhesion, drag reduction — using a narrow set of raw materials organized with extraordinary precision across scales. This paper synthesizes fourteen peer-reviewed sources (2016–2026) spanning structural biomimetics, green materials...

Aditi Chaudhary · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Polymer-Enabled Additive Manufacturing for Personalized Drug Delivery and Diagnostic Platforms: Materials, Architectures, Quality Control and Clinical Translation

Polymer-based three-dimensional (3D) printing has evolved from a prototyping approach toward a manufacturing strategy with emerging clinical relevance for individualized dosage forms, local drug depots, microneedle systems, microfluidic cartridges, biosensor housings and integrated theranostic platforms. Its value aris...

P. Pandian, V. Sethuraman, A. Shukla et al. · 0 citations
Review Oct 2026

Silk biomaterials in the era of digital manufacturing: Physics, processing, and biomedical translation

Additive manufacturing has gained prominence as a powerful platform for fabricating morphologically complex and functionally active biomaterial constructs for biomedical applications. Among biopolymers, silk has been extensively explored owing to its good mechanical properties (tensile strength 300–740 MPa, Young's mod...

Deepali Kadam, M. Aydogdu, Mohan Edirisinghe et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Bioactive Hydrogel Patches: Polymer Network Design, Fabrication, Functional Regulation, and Biomedical Applications

This review systematically examines material design and polymer network engineering, fabrication strategies, functional regulation, and biomedical applications of HPs, and emphasizes the strategic incorporation of bioactive, conductive, nanostructured, and stimuli‐responsive fillers to transform HPs from passive barrie...

Xin-Yue Wang, Li-Ya Jiang, Hui-Yi Geng et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Shape Memory Polymers as Functional Platforms for Dynamic Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medical Devices

Shape memory polymers (SMPs) have emerged as a distinctive class of functional polymers for tissue engineering and regenerative medical devices because they couple programmable shape transformation with the biological, mechanical, and degradation requirements of regenerating tissue. Unlike conventional static scaffolds...

Kyubae Lee · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

3D‐Printed Biomedical Materials for Personalized Medicine: Materials, Manufacturing Strategies, Translational Applications, and Future Perspectives

Personalized medical treatment aims to tailor diagnosis and treatment plans to individual patients, accounting for differences in anatomical structure, gene expression, and lesion microenvironment. Traditional mold‐based manufacturing methods can hardly produce implants that perfectly match unique patient lesions. Th...

Qingbing Wang, Ning Liang, Fengping Zhu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.