Jul 2026· International Conference on Computer, Information and Telecommunication Systems· pp. 1-8· 0 citations· 35 references
Abstract
The proliferation of online news content and the ever-growing threat of disinformation call for trust-assessment mechanisms that are transparent, participatory, and resistant to manipulation. Fully automated approaches can process large volumes of content but lack contextual judgement and public accountability, while centralised expert review is accurate but difficult to scale. Crowdsourced systems, in turn, suffer from uneven evaluator quality and the absence of topic-aware weighting. This paper proposes Proof-of-Media-Trust (PoMT), a blockchainsupported framework for decentralised media trust assessment that addresses these limitations by combining three complementary layers. First, an AI-based pre-evaluation layer extracts automatic indicators from each article before any human review takes place. Second, a participatory evaluation layer aggregates topic-specific reviews from ordinary users and domain experts, where the influence of each reviewer is determined by topicspecific expertise values and endorsement evidence. Trust scores are computed per topic when the accumulated evidence meets configurable thresholds; otherwise, the framework falls back to whichever evidence layer is sufficiently supported, or displays only automatic indicators for under-supported topics. Available topic scores are then combined into an overall article score. The same aggregation logic produces longitudinal credibility scores for media outlets and authors, both overall and per thematic area. Third, a three-layer distributed ledger records media-content commitments, evaluation evidence, and reviewer-performance updates in a tamper-evident and auditable manner, while a hybrid on-chain/off-chain design avoids replicating full article content on-chain. The resulting framework supports configurable, topicsensitive, and manipulation-resistant trust assessment at article, outlet, and author levels.
This study introduces TrustChain-Review, a framework that combines verifiable evidence, strategic incentives, and risk-sensitive governance to support more trustworthy code review and concludes that strong evidence-based governance is most appropriate for high-risk or audit-sensitive changes.
J-Trust is proposed, a blockchain-based governance framework that separates low-frequency rights confirmation from high-frequency academic collaboration through a main-side dual-chain architecture that sustains 115–120 TPS with 20–24 ms latency.
This article argues for an evidence-based approach that connects model behaviour, platform controls, user reliance, and auditable governance in enterprise reliability assessment in trust-aware LLM evaluation.
S. Borukar· International Journal of Sci...· 0 citations
\RC, a participant trust framework that uses blockchain as an evidence and provenance layer rather than as the source of trust, and supports a bounded reduction in reputation distortion, not attacker detection.
Adnan Iftekhar, Chengliang Zheng, Xiaohui Cui et al.· 0 citations
These findings support the technical feasibility of the implemented permissioned architecture under controlled conditions, but they do not establish national-scale performance or complete electoral security.
Emmanuel Elly Mushi, Gustaph Sanga, G. Tesha· East African Journal of Info...· 0 citations
An anonymous decentralised reputation scheme based on Hyperledger Fabric and Hyperledger Indy is proposed, which reduces such typical attacks as vote stuffing, bad-mouthing, and Sybil attacks and enhances the integrity and integrity of the reputation data.
Nagaraja Nalinikanth Elesela, Sanjay Kumar Sen· International Journal For Mu...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.