Aug 2026· Journalism and Media· 0 citations· 70 references
TL;DR
The paper concludes that hybrid human–AI workflows provide a practical bridge between traditional rule-based approaches and new generative models, offering scalable and cost-effective methods for studying source representation in journalism.
Abstract
To better understand how journalists represent sources, it is necessary to systematically study the use of reported speech in news coverage. This paper presents a method for LLM-assisted content analysis to identify and classify reported speech in Dutch newspapers automatically. The study evaluates a three-step procedure utilising role-based instructions to prompt the model as a professional journalist. First, a codebook for identifying citation structures and source types was developed with LLM support and then manually verified. Second, inter-coder reliability between human coders and the LLM was assessed on a representative sample of Dutch news articles using a human-in-the-loop validation approach. Third, the prompt-engineered LLM was used to code a large corpus spanning seven decades (1950–2024). Manual verification of 16,689 citations shows a weighted F1-score of 0.75, which aligns with recent benchmarks for high-capacity models performing complex journalistic coding. While human oversight remains the benchmark for reliability, due to issues such as repeated citations that were given as examples in the used prompts and representational bias, LLM-based systems perform sufficiently well for large-scale analyses of journalistic source use. The paper concludes that hybrid human–AI workflows provide a practical bridge between traditional rule-based approaches and new generative models, offering scalable and cost-effective methods for studying source representation in journalism.
Overall, the findings suggest that LLMs can approximate human coding in this case-specific setting, particularly at the coding level, and may serve as a scalable support tool for inductive qualitative analysis.
Leonardo Bergmann, Renata Gheorghiu, Ana Gvritishvili et al.· Research Square· 0 citations
Although LLM-based benchmark ratings can approximate expert judgments and reduce the need for labor-intensive human triple coding, limitations remain regarding cost, genre- and task specificity, and sensitivity to text presentation and student grade level—factors that constrain immediate classroom use, particularly for...
No overall preference is indicated between human and machine-generated summaries; however, experts with greater familiarity with the Bulletin and higher educational attainment showed a marked preference for the official summaries.
Claudia Biancotti, C. Camassa, Marco Fruzzetti et al.· 0 citations
The results show that high self-consistency does not necessarily indicate high agreement with human judgments when using local LLMs as automatic judges, and highlight the need to evaluate both consistency and human alignment when using local LLMs as automatic judges.
Large language models can report a numerical confidence together with generated content, but it is unclear whether this report is more than calibrated rhetoric. We analyze three training-free signals: confidence verbalized with the answer, post-hoc $P(\mathrm{True})$, and agreement with three additional generations on...
L. Meyer, Sofia Rossi, Wei Chen et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.