Skip to content

Using artificial intelligence in clinical practice: Royal Australasian College of Physicians position statement.

Aug 2026 · Internal medicine journal (Print) · 0 citations · 22 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The RACP advocates for physicians to engage in AI development and implementation using an agile human-in-the-loop approach that prioritises patient safety, clinical governance, professional training and collaboration with stakeholders.

Abstract

The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) has recently issued a position statement titled 'Using artificial intelligence in clinical practice', which provides a framework for the safe and ethical integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into physician practice. The statement outlines core principles for implementing, interacting with and monitoring AI tools to ensure they enhance rather than replace clinical judgement, protect patient safety and privacy and abide by ethical and regulatory standards. It identifies important benefits, such as increased administrative efficiency and improved support for clinical decision-making, while cautioning against risks such as algorithmic bias, data breaches and medicolegal liabilities. The statement also offers enabling strategies to overcome various barriers such as biased or inaccurate tools, professional and public resistance to the use of AI and adverse environmental impacts. The RACP advocates for physicians to engage in AI development and implementation using an agile human-in-the-loop approach that prioritises patient safety, clinical governance, professional training and collaboration with stakeholders.

View source

Similar papers

Sep 2026

Ethics and Professionalism in Artificial Intelligence and Medical Practice: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians.

Artificial intelligence (AI) in health care is being rapidly adopted in perhaps one of the most rapid implementations of technology in medicine to date. Better thought of as augmented intelligence, as a tool that provides assistance to physicians and patients, many guidelines for its use have been issued, but consensus...

Matthew DeCamp, Lois Snyder Sulmasy, Kyle E. Karches · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Artificial intelligence in medicine: An ethical and legal review.

This review addresses the primary ethical principles relevant to AI in medicine - including respect for patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice - alongside key legal frameworks with respect to liability, data protection, regulatory compliance, and algorithmic transparency.

Sebastian Schleidgen, O. Friedrich · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

From Algorithm to Bedside: A Clinician's Framework for AI in Practice

This article proposes seven questions that clinicians can run through to evaluate any clinical AI tool in the time it takes to read an abstract, alongside a traffic-light schema for matching oversight to risk and a short list of demands clinicians should make of vendors and institutions.

Alaa Abdelqader, M. Alkhateeb, Abdullah Al-Marrawi et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Standards and Guidance for Transparent Disclosure of Human-Artificial Intelligence Collaboration Content in Medical Research (2026).

This guidance provides a systematic framework for the standardized disclosure of human-AI collaboration content in medical research and offers actionable normative guidance for researchers,journal editors, peer reviewers, and academic institutions.

Unknown authors · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.