Abstract Large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) models are fundamentally transforming industries and redefining the paradigm of human–machine collaboration. While the technological revolution signals a new era of machine intelligence, the continued scaling of these models has exposed significant limitations in contemporary hardware architectures, manifesting as constraints on computational efficiency, interconnection bandwidth, and memory capacity. These three dimensions are inseparably intertwined, such that advances along any single axis often exacerbate bottlenecks in the others, rendering isolated optimizations increasingly ineffective. Achieving an optimal balance among them to maximize system efficiency therefore remains a central challenge in the design of scalable AI systems. To address this challenge, we introduce Computation-Bandwidth-Memory Trade-offs, termed the AI Trinity, a unified paradigm that positions computation , bandwidth , and memory as coequal pillars for next-generation AI infrastructure. Inspired by the device-edge-cloud collaboration principle from the AI Flow framework, we formulate AI Trinity as a resource-theoretic view of the computation-bandwidth-memory bottlenecks in distributed AI systems. Within this framework, AI Trinity identifies three fundamental trade-offs: (1) More Computation $$\rightarrow$$ → Less Bandwidth, wherein computational resources are exploited to reduce data transmission under limited bandwidth conditions, (2) More Bandwidth $$\rightarrow$$ → Less Memory, which exploits abundant communication capacity to populate or refresh memory when local storage resources are constrained, and (3) More Memory $$\rightarrow$$ → Less Computation, whereby storage capacity are utilized to mitigate redundant computation when computational costs are prohibitive. We illustrate its effectiveness through representative system designs spanning edge–cloud communication, large-scale distributed training, and model inference. The innovations embodied in AI Trinity advance a new paradigm for scalable AI infrastructure, providing both a conceptual foundation and practical guidance for a broad range of application scenarios.
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of such models.
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
Empirically, PRISM reduces the end-to-end time for data selection and model tuning to just 30% of conventional pipelines, and achieves this efficiency while simultaneously enhancing performance, surpassing models fine-tuned on the full dataset across eight multimodal and three language understanding benchmarks.
Jinhe Bi, Yifan Wang, Danqi Yan et al.· arXiv.org· 73 citations· ⚡4
The method, ECCOLA, is presented, which aims at making the high-level AI ethics principles more practical, making it possible for developers to more easily implement them in practice.
Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, P. Abrahamsson· EUROMICRO Conference on Soft...· 64 citations· ⚡6
This paper designs Markov decision processes (MDPs) for different combinatorial problems and proposes to train conditional GFlowNets to sample from the solution space and demonstrates that GFlowNet policies can efficiently find high-quality solutions.
Dinghuai Zhang, H. Dai, Esmeralda S. Whitammer et al.· Advances in Neural Informati...· 59 citations· ⚡8
An empirical study on the current state of practice in artificial intelligence ethics is conducted by means of a multiple case study of five case companies, which indicates a gap between research and practice in the area.
Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Joni Kultanen et al.· arXiv.org· 56 citations· ⚡6