Organisations collect large amounts of safety data concerning safety events. However, many organisations are still in their infancy in this regard, especially when it comes to utilising large datasets containing textual safety data to support their safety management. Fast-developing Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning methods offer new possibilities for efficient analysis of textual data. In this paper, we discuss aspects related to using AI to support safety management. The main contribution is to examine the possibilities and challenges of using machine learning methods to analyse unstructured textual safety data from organisations’ incident reports and accident investigation texts in order to identify and classify the contributing factors. To this end, we fine-tuned a pretrained Large Language Model (LLM), using Human Factors (HF) and the HF Tool as a framework, to classify the contributing factors mentioned in report texts. The HF Tool supports the systemic analysis of safety incidents and guides the identification of contributing factors at individual, work, group/team, and organisational levels. Furthermore, the LLM developed in this study, AN-HF-classifier-V1, was evaluated on two distinct datasets comprised of excerpts, which were classified according to HF Tool by human factors experts. Our findings suggested that this classifier may support the identification of HF from large textual datasets. However, we found that the quality of textual safety data needs to be improved to include more comprehensive and accurate factors contributing to incidents. The need to improve the quality of data applies regardless of whether AI is used in the analysis or not.
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of such models.
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.
P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al.· IEEE International Conferenc...· 110 citations· ⚡7