Sep 2026· International Journal of Law Politics and Governance· 40 references
Abstract
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence has enabled the creation and dissemination of highly realistic deepfake content, creating significant challenges for electoral integrity and constitutional democracy. This paper critically examines the impact of deepfakes on democratic elections, with particular emphasis on the constitutional tension between safeguarding electoral processes and protecting freedom of expression. Adopting a qualitative, interpretivist and inductive approach, the research relies on secondary data comprising academic literature, legislation, judicial decisions, governmental reports and policy documents, analysed through thematic analysis. The paper finds that deepfakes can facilitate political misinformation, voter manipulation, identity impersonation and declining public trust, while existing legal frameworks remain insufficiently specific to address election-related synthetic media. A comparative assessment of India, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States demonstrates significant differences in legislative clarity, platform accountability and election-specific regulation. The research further establishes that excessive regulation may suppress legitimate political expression, whereas inadequate regulation may undermine informed democratic participation. It therefore advocates a proportionate constitutional approach based on clear and dedicated deepfake election legislation, stronger platform accountability and transparency, technological detection, digital literacy, judicial oversight and international regulatory cooperation. Such measures can strengthen electoral integrity while preserving the fundamental democratic value of freedom of expression in the digital era. Keywords: political misinformation; Deepfake Technology; Electoral Integrity; Constitutional Democracy; Freedom of Expression
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of such models.
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
Empirically, PRISM reduces the end-to-end time for data selection and model tuning to just 30% of conventional pipelines, and achieves this efficiency while simultaneously enhancing performance, surpassing models fine-tuned on the full dataset across eight multimodal and three language understanding benchmarks.
Jinhe Bi, Yifan Wang, Danqi Yan et al.· arXiv.org· 73 citations· ⚡4
The method, ECCOLA, is presented, which aims at making the high-level AI ethics principles more practical, making it possible for developers to more easily implement them in practice.
Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, P. Abrahamsson· EUROMICRO Conference on Soft...· 64 citations· ⚡6
This paper designs Markov decision processes (MDPs) for different combinatorial problems and proposes to train conditional GFlowNets to sample from the solution space and demonstrates that GFlowNet policies can efficiently find high-quality solutions.
Dinghuai Zhang, H. Dai, Esmeralda S. Whitammer et al.· Advances in Neural Informati...· 59 citations· ⚡8
An empirical study on the current state of practice in artificial intelligence ethics is conducted by means of a multiple case study of five case companies, which indicates a gap between research and practice in the area.
Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Joni Kultanen et al.· arXiv.org· 56 citations· ⚡6