Skip to content

Adversarial Defense and Detection Framework for Encrypted Network Traffic Classification

Jul 2026 · Concurrency and Computation · Vol 38 · 0 citations · 32 references

TL;DR

This paper proposes an adversarial defense and detection framework with a hybrid architecture to effectively defend encrypted traffic classifiers against sophisticated adversarial attacks.

Abstract

The current CNN‐based encrypted traffic classifiers achieve high accuracy in normal situations, but are very susceptible to adversarial attacks resulting in significant reductions in classification accuracy. In addition, traditional defense methods such as adversarial training (AT) have been inconsistent across traffic types, causing model collapse in some domains and only providing partial defense with limited coverage of the attacks. Finally, when standalone defense methods are employed, for example, feature squeezing or denoising autoencoders, they provide only partial protection and do not cover all attacks. In this paper, we propose an adversarial defense and detection framework with a hybrid architecture to overcome these drawbacks. The first module is an autoencoder‐based restoration module to remove adversarially corrupted traffic inputs before classification. The second is a multisignal detection module which consists of eight indicators that include reconstruction error, LID, KL divergence, prediction uncertainty, physical plausibility, and activation pattern to identify and flag adversarial samples. The framework's average true‐positive detection rate is 85% and its restoration accuracy is 84.30%, revealing that a combined approach is required to effectively defend encrypted traffic classifiers against sophisticated adversarial attacks. Two standard benchmark datasets, CIC‐Darknet2020 (95.36% accuracy with baseline CNN) and CIC‐IDS2017 (90.95% accuracy with baseline CNN), are used to evaluate the proposed framework, and the accuracy of the baseline CNN drops to 8.56% and 34.43%, respectively, when the adversarial attacks are applied prior to the defense.

View source

Similar papers

Review Aug 2026

A Comprehensive Review on Adversarial Attacks and Detection Techniques in Deep Learning Models for Image Analysis

The research methodology involved a systematic literature review using the Scopus database, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and focusing on recent advancements in attack and defence techniques.

Reeti Jaswal, Vikas Khullar, Surya Narayan Panda · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Enhancing robustness of deep learning-based malware detection against adversarial attacks

This paper introduces DefendMal, a novel framework that synergistically combines Denoise Autoencoder with Sequence Squeezing, a Context-aware Adversarial Generator (CAG-AdvGAN), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) adversarial training, and a Positive–Negative Detector with Variational Autoencoder (PNDetector-VAE) to enhan...

Dennis Benedict Crasta, Vikash Kumar · 0 citations
Open access 2026

A Two-Stage Adversarial Defense Architecture for Robust Fraud Detection on Imbalanced Financial Data

This paper proposes a unified dual-defense framework that jointly integrates adversarial training with a denoising autoencoder (DAE)-based filtering mechanism, specifically designed for imbalanced tabular financial data under adversarial conditions, and explicitly targets adversarial robustness in financial fraud detec...

M. Javeed, Jannatul Maua, M. Mridha et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

An advanced framework for malware detection using adversarial learning

A systematic framework to enhance adversarial robustness is proposed, validated on the Malimg dataset and supersedes previous approaches by 13.15% in terms of the evasion rate and 37.34% in terms of retraining success.

Muhammad Arham Tariq, Allah Bux Sargano, Z. Habib et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Detecting adversarial evasion in deep learning intrusion detection systems using explainable AI

Deep learning based network intrusion detection systems (IDS) can achieve strong traffic classification performance, but their resilience to adversarial manipulation remains a critical concern. This study evaluates the adversarial robustness of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) models in a mu...

Elijah M. Maseno, Yanxia Sun, Zenghui Wang · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Evaluating need for adversarial training data given algorithmic defense methods against adversarial attacks

This study set up a baseline image classifier for images of digits and attacked the images using the fast gradient sign method, and hypothesized that introducing adversarial training for this classifier would significantly improve downstream classification accuracy in all three algorithmic defense settings.

Braden Yian, Clayton Greenberg · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.