Sep 2026· Current Plant Biology· Vol 50, pp. 100657· 128 references
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Abstract
Meeting the increasing demand for safe, nutritious, and climate-resilient food requires innovative strategies to enhance vegetable productivity and quality while overcoming the limitations of conventional breeding. Vegetables are vital sources of essential nutrients, vitamins, minerals, and bioactive compounds; however, their genetic improvement remains constrained by long generation cycles, complex reproductive biology, and labor-intensive selection processes. Therefore, modern breeding practices are needed on an urgent basis to speed up the generation time of vegetable cultivars. The emerging genome editing techniques complement conventional breeding approaches by enabling the rapid development of improved cultivars with targeted agronomic, nutritional and stress resilience traits. Among genome editing tools, the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) /CRISPR-associated protein-9 (Cas9) genome editing technique has received extensive attention in recent years due to its precise and highly efficient editing in genomes. This review provides a critical assessment of recent advances in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated vegetable improvement, with emphasis on applications in yield enhancement, nutritional quality improvement, abiotic and biotic stress tolerance, and de novo domestication. Furthermore, we highlight the emerging integration of CRISPR/Cas9 with speed breeding and artificial intelligence (AI)-guided target selection as a next-generation breeding strategy to accelerate gene discovery, improve editing precision, shorten generation cycles, and facilitate the development of transgene-free (T-DNA-free) elite vegetable cultivars. We also critically evaluate the current bottlenecks in vegetable genome editing and discuss future opportunities for integrating advanced genome editing technologies, AI-enabled approaches, and accelerated breeding pipelines to overcome these challenges and facilitate the development of sustainable, climate-resilient vegetable crops.
Some claim that especially in the field of agile software development the research lags years behind of the practice. In this paper, we characterize the status and main challenges for research on agile software development, and propose a preliminary roadmap, focusing on providing more empirical research, primarily on e...
Torgeir Dingsøyr, T. Dybå, P. Abrahamsson· Agile Conference· 92 citations· ⚡7
The results indicate that software developers are a slightly happy population, but the need for limiting the unhappiness of developers remains, and 219 factors representing causes of unhappiness while developing software are identified.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡6
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6
The goal is to not only refine the accuracy of the LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.
Z. Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem et al.· arXiv.org· 62 citations· ⚡3
Agile methods continue to gain popularity. In particular, the Scrum method appears to be on the verge of becoming a de-facto standard in the industry, leading the so called Agile movement. While there are success stories and recommendations, there is little scientifically valid evidence of the challenges in the adoptio...
A. Marchenko, P. Abrahamsson· Agile Conference· 59 citations· ⚡11
A comprehensive overview of how enhanced sampling methods are reshaping the field, with a particular focus on the data-driven construction of collective variables, is provided.
Kai Zhu, Enrico Trizio, Jintu Zhang et al.· Chemical Reviews· 58 citations