Skip to content

Persistent Sparse Autoencoders: Learning Feature-Specific Timescales in Language Model Representations

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 33 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work introduces Persistent Sparse Autoencoders (Persistent SAEs), an extension of standard SAEs that learns a persistence coefficient for each feature, allowing the model to learn feature-specific timescales from reconstruction alone.

Abstract

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) decompose language model activations into sparse features, yet these models traditionally encode each token independently, failing to expose information that persists across a sequence. We first show that temporal persistence can naturally emerge in standard SAE features: after a feature activates, the hidden state remains aligned with its direction, and past activations help reconstruct later hidden states. How long this lasts varies widely across features. We therefore introduce Persistent Sparse Autoencoders (Persistent SAEs), an extension of standard SAEs that learns a persistence coefficient for each feature, allowing the model to learn feature-specific timescales from reconstruction alone. Our experiments show that Persistent SAEs retain competitive reconstruction quality while learning a spectrum of timescales: short-timescale (fast) features stay locally interpretable, whereas long-timescale (slow) features accumulate information that identifies the current context. Moreover, we show in a prompt-injection monitoring case study that slow features preserve injection-related signals and remain causally effective over long contexts. These results suggest that Persistent SAEs offer new opportunities for interpreting and monitoring language models via persistent sparse features.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

SharedSAE: One Feature Dictionary Across Language Models

This work shows that a single shared SAE can replace a collection of dedicated per-model SAEs, and combines a shared dictionary with model-specific encoder-decoder pairs to achieve near-dedicated-SAE reconstruction quality.

Daniil A. Ognev, Célian Vasson, Li-Jie Hu et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

What Does an LLM Learn from Reinforcement Learning? A Mechanistic Interpretability Perspective with Fixed-SAE Track

Fixed-SAE Track is introduced, a framework that trains one shared SAE per considered layer on activations pooled across the base model and all RL checkpoints, holding every feature direction fixed so that representation shifts are rigorously defined through the activations of interpretable SAE latents, including the de...

Ling-Heng Du, Yi-Ming Tang, Xufeng Duan et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Beyond a Bag of Features: Set-Level Instability in Sparse Autoencoders

It is found that SAE activation sets do not recover human category boundaries or within-category typicality more faithfully than dense embeddings or residual-stream states, but instead track model-internal similarity structure.

Nikolai Bolik, Lennart Stöpler, Artur Andrzejak · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Listening Forward: Next Patch Embedding Prediction Enables Scalable Audio Learners

NAPE (Next-Audio-Patch-Embedding prediction), a self-supervised framework in which a causal Transformer predicts each next patch embedding of a log-mel spectrogram from the previous ones, using causal masking and stop-gradient as its sole training signal is introduced.

Umberto Cappellazzo, Xu-Bo Liu, Stavros Petridis et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 27, 2026

Looking beyond natural sequences

A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.