Control Memory Interference is introduced, a controlled diagnostic and data-generation framework for studying how agent memory evolves under different memory relationships and shows that memory evolution is shaped not only by memory scale, but also by interactions among accumulated experiences.
Abstract
Long-term memory enables AI agents to maintain continuity across sessions, personalize behavior, and evolve through accumulated experience. Yet memory evolution is not simply a process of storing more information: new experiences may reinforce, revise, or interfere with existing memory states. Existing systems mainly emphasize memory construction and relevance-based retrieval, but several memories may remain simultaneously relevant while differing in state, temporal validity, or authority. We introduce Controlled Memory Interference (CMI), a controlled diagnostic and data-generation framework for studying how agent memory evolves under different memory relationships. Across controlled memory evolution, benign accumulation has limited effects, whereas relationship-specific interference sharply suppresses update plasticity with little stability gain, either by blocking target-memory exposure or by disrupting its downstream use. Lexical and Dense retrieval exhibit distinct interference pathways, while poisoning is more sensitive to update-authority cues than to recency alone. Beyond diagnosis, CMI provides targeted examples for interference-aware memory learning, improving the distinction between valid updates and interference-inducing memories while preserving performance on original memory tasks. These findings show that memory evolution is shaped not only by memory scale, but also by interactions among accumulated experiences. More broadly, memory interference emerges as an important factor for reliable continual agent memory systems.
Learned-memory methods store information in an explicit table and consume it through a separate reader, allowing addressing, storage, and reading to be modified independently. We study whether useful memory can also be generated rather than only retrieved. MemoryAthena uses three pathways: direct Engram retrieval (E),...
Ming-Yuan Li, Guang-Sheng Yu, Ju-Yuan Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Long-term memory is essential for LLM-based agents operating over extended interactions. Existing memory systems primarily update memory when new information arrives, treating retrieval as the endpoint of memory access rather than a driver of memory evolution. Consequently, retrieval feedback is rarely exploited to reo...
Yuan-Yi Song, Yukai Wang, Xinbei Ma et al.· 0 citations
Memory is a core component of AI agents, enabling them to accumulate experience, maintain personalization, and adapt over long-term interactions. However, existing memory systems often remain fixed after development, limiting their ability to adapt their memory models, organization strategies, and procedural knowledge...
Kaichao Liang, Yu-Qi Cui, Hao Kong et al.· 0 citations
This study compares MemoryLake, a structured multi-track memory backend, with Mem0, text-embedding-3-small vector RAG, and a long-context control across all five MemoryArena domains, to support a workload-dependent view of memory backends and an observed lead among the four evaluated systems.
Chao-Shun Zhan, Qiang Zhou, Guannan Li et al.· 0 citations
Visual working memory performance declines with the quantity of material stored and the duration of its maintenance, but it is disputed whether these constraints are independent or interact. Specifically, different studies have reached contradictory conclusions on whether greater memory load accelerates deterioration o...
Ivan Tomić, Sebastian Schneegans, Paul M. Bays· Psychology Review· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.