This paper identifies the reliability challenge created by democratized AI agent creation and proposes a lightweight continuous-assurance framework for citizen-created organizational agents that combines dependency mapping, readiness contracts, scheduled checks, diagnostics, and lifecycle governance to assess whether an agent remains operationally ready under expected conditions.
Abstract
AI agents are increasingly created inside organizations by non-engineering users through low-code, no-code, and conversational development environments. This democratization enables rapid local innovation, but it also creates a reliability gap: agents that appear to users as simple productivity artifacts may depend on changing models, tools, retrieval sources, permissions, prompts, schedules, and external services. These dependencies can cause silent degradation long after deployment, even when no user directly modifies the agent. This paper identifies the reliability challenge created by democratized AI agent creation and proposes a lightweight continuous-assurance framework for citizen-created organizational agents. The framework combines dependency mapping, readiness contracts, scheduled checks, diagnostics, and lifecycle governance to assess whether an agent remains operationally ready under expected conditions. We also present an initial prototype auditor and scenario-based assessment showing how the proposed taxonomy can be translated into practical checks and actionable remediation guidance.
This paper proposes AI-GRACE (Agentic Intelligence-Governance, Risk, Assurance, Controls, and Evidence) as a use-case operationalization framework connecting organizational governance with technical implementation, using design science to frame the method contribution and situational method engineering to guide context...
This Perspective introduces the democratic authorization gap, defined as a break or attenuation in the demonstrable chain connecting legally and democratically grounded public authority to actions selected, sequenced, or executed by an AI agent.
Mohammed Salah, Fadi Abdelfattah, Aisha Al Araimi et al.· Frontiers in Political Scien...· 0 citations
AI agents increasingly enter practitioner workflows through delegated, multi-step tasks, such as data analysis, document review, coding, and summarization. Existing governance debates tend to emphasize provider-level technical governance, which steers general model behavior, and policy, which defines the boundaries of...
Nick Hagar, Nick Diakopoulos· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
This paper argues that the introduction of agentic AI requires a substantial expansion of traditional enterprise architecture principles to address new behavioral, security, and governance risks emerging from non-deterministic AI systems interacting with heterogeneous operational platforms-ERP, HCM, CLM, asset manageme...
Elizabeth Koumpan, Vimal Dimpi· AHFE International· 0 citations
The pairing a dual mandate is called and it is argued, from eighteen years spent migrating enterprise build and deployment infrastructure through several earlier paradigm shifts, that the two obligations are not separable line items but one reinforcing system.
Sonu Kumar· International journal of com...· 0 citations
TessIndex is a capability-verified identity system for agent primitives that utilizes a dual-plane architecture: the blockchain records compact commitments for identity, ownership, and verification, while centralized servers maintain dynamic metadata for discovery, commerce and reputation.