Artificial Intelligence Governance and Industrial Development: Transnational Spillovers, Technology Transfer, and Sustainable Territorial Implications in Brazil
The article contributes to the literature on AI governance and development by introducing the concept of transnational regulatory spillovers as a driver of sustainable territorial transformation, offering relevant insights for policymakers and stakeholders navigating the global dynamics of digital transition.
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) governance and industrial development, focusing on the transnational spillover effects of China’s regulatory framework on Brazil. Positioned at the intersection of technology governance, territorial development, and sustainability, the paper analyses how emerging AI regulatory models generate indirect impacts on partner economies through mechanisms of technology transfer, infrastructure complementarities, and regulatory alignment. Using a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach applied to panel data from 25 Brazilian industrial sectors (2019–2025), the findings indicate that sectors with higher exposure to AI experienced a significant increase in output following the formalization of China–Brazil AI cooperation. The results reveal that these effects are mediated by open-source technological ecosystems, increased investment in digital infrastructure, and reduced regulatory uncertainty, contributing to enhanced industrial performance and adaptive capacity. Beyond economic outcomes, the study highlights the territorial implications of AI governance, particularly in fostering more balanced regional development, strengthening innovation ecosystems, and supporting pathways toward sustainable and resilient industrial systems. The article contributes to the literature on AI governance and development by introducing the concept of transnational regulatory spillovers as a driver of sustainable territorial transformation, offering relevant insights for policymakers and stakeholders navigating the global dynamics of digital transition.
This study examines how artificial intelligence (AI) and digital transformation (DT) are reshaping the operational performance of Vietnamese commercial banks, while clarifying the role of banking governance in translating technological capabilities into sustainable business value. The study adopts a qualitative approac...
T. Tran, Huyen Thi Thanh Nguyen· Journal of economics, financ...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly viewed as a lever for the low-carbon transition, yet little is known about whether policy interventions that build AI capacity translate into better corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) outcomes. Exploiting the designation of National Pilot Zones for Innovat...
Kun-Zhe Yuan· Business and Management Pers...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a transformative technology shaping economic development and technological innovation, especially in emerging economies. The factors that influence the adoption of AI, however, are under‐researched, particularly in structurally heterogeneous settings like the E7 countries. Th...
Fan Bu, M. Javed, U. Kashif· Journal of International Dev...· 0 citations
Empirical results indicate that AI development can significantly enhance AICR, and provides empirical evidence as well as targeted policy implications for leveraging AI to enhance AICR and propel sustainable agricultural transformation.
Zan Zhao, Wei-Jing Xi, Guang-Ming Lv et al.· Economic Change and Restruct...· 0 citations
A quantifiable multi‐stakeholder governance framework and actionable policy insights for China and the Global South are offered and econometric evidence from difference‐in‐differences, threshold regressions, and spatial econometric models robustly addresses concerns about AI.
Zhuo-Cheng Lu, Fei Fan, Zhen-Nan Yang et al.· Public Administration· 0 citations
The study aims to assess the relationship between the intensity of digitalization, the use of artificial intelligence, and the effectiveness of regional economic management in Russia. The empirical dataset covers the period 2020–2025, with a key inter-regional analysis based on 2024 data. The study encompasses 85 const...
Ekaterina S. Orlova, Ruslan A. Musukov, M. D. Gochiyaeva· EKONOMIKA I UPRAVLENIE: PROB...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.