Efficacy of Beta-blocker Therapy in Post-myocardial Infarction Patients with Preserved or Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Jul 2026· Journal of Cardiac Critical Care TSS· Vol 10, pp. 163-172· 0 citations· 29 references
TL;DR
In contemporary reperfusion-era populations with pEF or mrEF, long-term beta-blocker therapy after MI does not confer significant reductions in mortality or recurrent MI, challenging the historical paradigm of universal post-MI beta-blockade and support a more selective, individualized approach guided by LVEF.
Abstract
Beta-blockers improve outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but their benefit in patients with preserved ejection fraction (pEF) or mildly reduced ejection fraction (mrEF) remains unclear in the era of modern reperfusion and optimized therapy. This study evaluates the long-term impact of beta-blockers in this population.
Following a systematic search of four databases, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in post–myocardial infarction patients with LVEF ≥40%, comparing long-term beta-blocker therapy with usual care. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and recurrent MI; secondary outcomes included cardiovascular (CV) mortality, heart failure hospitalization (HFH), malignant ventricular arrhythmias, ischemic stroke, and unplanned coronary revascularization. Data were pooled using random-effects models.
Four multicenter RCTs (9892 patients in the beta-blocker group and 9934 in the control group) conducted between 2017 and 2024 were included, with a median follow-up of 3.5–3.7 years. Beta-blocker therapy was not associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.98, confidence intervals [CI] 0.85–1.12) or recurrent MI (HR: 0.88, CI 0.74–1.05). No benefit was observed for secondary outcomes, including CV mortality, HFH, malignant arrhythmias, ischemic stroke, or unplanned revascularization. Heterogeneity was low to moderate, and study quality was moderate overall, with high certainty for primary outcomes.
In contemporary reperfusion-era populations with pEF or mrEF, long-term beta-blocker therapy after MI does not confer significant reductions in mortality or recurrent MI. These findings challenge the historical paradigm of universal post-MI beta-blockade and support a more selective, individualized approach guided by LVEF.
In this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, beta-blocker use was not associated with a significant reduction in the primary composite outcome or in mortality or reinfarction, and should be interpreted with caution in the context of an overall neutral result.
Leonardo David Neira-Chunga, Diego Moncada-Gutiérrez, G. Vásquez-Tirado et al.· Medicina Intensiva· 0 citations
In stable patients with previous myocardial infarction, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%, no heart failure, and no other indication for β-blocker therapy, discontinuation met the non-inferiority criteria for the primary and key secondary endpoints.
J. Silvain, Ki H. Choi, Victorien Monguillon et al.· The Lancet· 1 citation
The modified TRS-2P stratified baseline risk and provided estimates of absolute beta-blocker benefit, supporting further evaluation of individualized, risk-guided treatment after MI in patients with LVEF ≥40%.
H. Caglar, T. Holmager, A. Kristensen et al.· European Heart Journal - Qua...· 0 citations
In contemporary revascularized patients with preserved or mildly reduced EF, β-blocker discontinuation was not associated with a credible increase in death or MACE, whether stopped in the stable phase or the acute-withdrawal phase; the prior harm likely reflects immortal-time bias and inclusion of non-revascularized pa...
Abdul Basit, K. Mahajan, Ashfaq Ahmad et al.· Journal of Saidu Medical Col...· 0 citations
Among patients with AMI complicated by HF, in-hospital BB use was associated with lower 1-year adverse outcomes risk in HFrEF/HFmrEF, but not in HFpEF.
In HFpEF, beta-blocker discontinuation improved functional capacity and quality-of-life at 2 weeks compared with continuation with no clear effect on cognition, echocardiographic parameters or CV biomarkers, but findings on important long-term clinical outcomes was conflicting.
Wade Thompson, Nima Alaeiilkhchi, Lisa M. McCarthy et al.· Journal of Cardiac Failure· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.