2026· Восток Афро-Азиатские общества история и современность· pp. 157· 0 citations
Abstract
The present article examines politeness strategies of Chinese diplomacy as the culturally particular system of semantic and pragmatic means intended to ensure smooth international communication. The focus is on the cross-cultural character of politeness strategies and on the challenges of rendering Chinese diplomatic tone markers into English and Russian. The problem is urgent because there is still a limited number of comparative studies that cover lexical-semantic, pragmatic and other dimensions of translation of politeness in Chinese diplomatic discourse, which is particularly relevant in the context of globalization.
The methodology of the research includes conceptual-pragmatic analysis of contemporary Chinese formal diplomatic papers (2019-2025) and comparative analysis of their English and Russian equivalents. The analysis reveals that the most significant structural, semantic, and pragmatic features of Chinese diplomatic politeness are honorific nominations, euphemisms, hedging, and indirect constructions. The analysis shows that literal translation results in the loss of meaning and pragmatics particularly when the transfer involves culturally-specific aspects of politeness such as those pertaining to harmony, hierarchy and relational empathy. According to the results obtained, Chinese diplomatic politeness is a particular communicative model, which is focused on the preservation of harmony, hierarchy and face in international relations. The outcomes of this study can be applied to develop translation theory and intercultural communication by clarifying the cultural rationale of Chinese diplomatic discourse and giving useful instructions to translator education and cross-cultural adaptation of politeness strategies.
In real practice, political text translations are in line with a country’s main foreign policies. Thus, an in-depth understanding on communicative strategies employed in translating political texts, e.g. press statements, is essential. The paper analyses the translation of press statements from the Source Text (Mandari...
A. N. V. Hutabarat· Paradigma Jurnal Kajian Buda...· 0 citations
The present study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of palindromic constructions across three typologically distinct languages: Russian, Arabic, and Chinese. The research problem stems from the paucity of comprehensive scholarship addressing both universal and language-specific mechanisms underlying the functionin...
O. V. Makarova, Y. Chernykh, V. S. Chernykh· Nauchnyi Dialog· 0 citations
This article examines how phatic norms in Kazakh and English are condensed in the shift from face-to-face interaction to digital communication while preserving culturally specific meanings. It focuses on brief confirmations, forms of address, gratitude formulas, apologies, emojis, and other signals that sustain social...
Konyrbayeva Gulnur Saukhanovna, Smagulova Guldarkhan Nurgaziyevna, Kazhibayeva Gulden et al.· Journal of Language Teaching...· 0 citations
The article presents a contrastive analysis of the functional-pragmatic characteristics of the speech act of gratitude in Vietnamese and Russian. The relevance of the study is determined, firstly, by the key role of gratitude as a universal mechanism for maintaining interpersonal harmony and regulating communicative pr...
T. S. Nguyen, V. M. Bukharov· KAZAN LINGUISTIC JOURNAL· 0 citations
This article investigates the linguistic-pragmatic nature of subjectivity and the positioning strategies through which speakers of English and Uzbek encode stance, evaluation, and epistemic commitment in discourse. Grounded in the theoretical traditions of subjectification (Traugott, 1989; Langacker, 1990) and stance/p...
Kh Kodirov· “ADVANCED JOURNAL OF UNIVERS...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.