Skip to content
Open access

Generative text as a challenge to creativity and academic ethics

Jul 2026 · Mokslo taikomieji tyrimai / Applied Research · Vol 1, pp. 113-120 · 0 citations · 10 references

TL;DR

How generative text reshapes the understanding of creative activity and academic ethics in educational and research contexts is analyzed to highlight the need to reconceptualise academic integrity as a reflective process-oriented practice and to develop educational frameworks that promote ethical literacy, transparency, and responsible authorship.

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools based on large language model (LLM) technology are transforming processes of creation, writing, and learning in higher education, raising questions about authorship, originality, and academic responsibility. Despite the growing body of research, existing studies mainly focus on regulation and plagiarism, while paying less attention to broader transformations in creativity and academic ethics. The aim of this article is to analyse how generative text reshapes the understanding of creative activity and academic ethics in educational and research contexts. The study adopts a qualitative, theoretical-analytical approach combining hermeneutic and discourse analysis. The analysis is based on three illustrative cases from language learning, translation practice, and academic writing, which are examined as analytical instances to explore emerging ethical and cultural tensions. The findings indicate that the key challenges associated with generative AI are primarily cultural and pedagogical rather than technological. Generative systems redistribute creative agency between human actors and algorithmic tools, transforming the role of the author into that of an editor, coordinator, and ethical decision-maker. While AI enhances productivity and linguistic accuracy, unreflective use risks diminishing interpretive depth, personal voice, and value-based reasoning. The results highlight the need to reconceptualise academic integrity as a reflective process-oriented practice and to develop educational frameworks that promote ethical literacy, transparency, and responsible authorship. The study contributes to the field by offering an integrative perspective that positions generative AI as a catalyst for rethinking creativity, authorship, and ethical responsibility in contemporary higher education.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY IN THE ERA OF GENERATIVE AI: AUTHORSHIP, AUTHENTICITY AND FORMATIVE EXPERIENCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION

It is concluded that academic integrity cannot be reduced to rule compliance or technological surveillance, but must be understood as a constitutive dimension of educational experience, linked to intellectual honesty, responsibility, and critical formation.

Messias José dos Santos · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Humanising Generative AI in Open and Distance Learning: Paraphrasing as a Cognitive and Ethical Learning Practice

Examination of how South African ODeL students describe and rationalise their use of large language model tools in academic writing indicates that students consistently frame paraphrasing as an ethical practice aligned with institutional expectations, even when their engagement with AI involves varying degrees of autom...

M. Ngoveni, M. Graham, Mathelela Steyn Mokgwathi · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Negotiating AI in academic writing: Student voices on autonomy, ethics, and process-based learning

Investigation of how university students negotiate autonomy, ethical responsibility, and cognitive engagement in the context of integrating AI into a Process-Based Approach to academic writing indicates that AI-mediated writing is not only a matter of tool use but a site of negotiation, in which learners negotiate effi...

Rizky Lutviana, Teguh Sulistyo, Maria Purnawati · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Why Students Use Generative Artificial Intelligence for Essay Editing: A Configurational Method and Multidimensional Ethics Scale Perspective

Students’ acceptance and rejection of GAI-supported essay editing follow asymmetric configurational logics, showing how different ethical judgments combine to explain academic technology use in a morally ambiguous context.

J. de Andrés-Sánchez, Antonio Pérez-Portabella, Mario Arias-Oliva et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.