Neuron steering reinforces dialect in some varieties when the prompt is already dialectal but cannot induce it from MSA prompts, whereas vector steering succeeds in both settings, and Arabic dialects are therefore steerable mainly through distributed rather than localized representations.
Abstract
Dialectal data are scarce relative to Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), causing Arabic LLMs to overproduce MSA and struggle with dialectally accurate generation. This raises a fundamental interpretability question about where and how dialectal features are encoded within model internals and whether these representations can improve dialect generation without fine-tuning. We study two inference-time approaches as interpretability probes and control mechanisms. First, neuron-level analysis identifies sparse populations that encode dialect-specific features and tests whether amplifying or suppressing them steers model outputs toward target dialects. Second, vector steering extracts dialect-specific activation directions and injects them during inference, motivated by feature entanglement at the neuron level. We find that these neurons are real but only partially explanatory. They occupy under 1\% of MLP dimensions but span only 5\% to 21\% of the residual dialect direction. This limited coverage is causally consequential. Neuron steering reinforces dialect in some varieties when the prompt is already dialectal but cannot induce it from MSA prompts, whereas vector steering succeeds in both settings. Arabic dialects are therefore steerable mainly through distributed rather than localized representations
These findings show that strong performance on Standard Vietnamese does not guarantee reliable behavior under meaning-preserving regional variation, and the first systematic evaluation of LLM robustness to Vietnamese dialect variation across multiple tasks is presented.
Previous work on Egyptian Arabic in NLP has focused largely on the prestigious Cairene Egyptian Arabic (CEA) dialect, resulting in a lack of representation for the less prestigious Sa'idi Egyptian Arabic (SEA) dialect both in LLM and resource development. Does this lack of representation influence an LLM's view of the...
Mai Mohamed Eida, Ryan Dolan, Paul Leonce Irma De Nijs et al.· 0 citations
The study traces this dialect tax across the natural language processing pipeline, suggesting that the dialect tax is encoded and accumulated not by any one step in isolation, but at every step of the language modeling process.
Elle Michelle Yang, Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek et al.· 0 citations
Brief Description
This variable proposes LLM-Assisted Dialect Gloss Detection (see also Bommarito & Michael, 2025; Liang et al., 2026) and refers to the automated identification, contextual interpretation, and measurement of dialectal, vernacular, or otherwise non-standard linguistic forms in digital texts (Joshi et al...
Géraldine Bengsch· DOCA - Database of Variables...· 0 citations
ALMIEYAR is introduced, a culturally grounded ASR benchmark covering 17 Arabic dialects across six families, built entirely from newly recorded speech unseen by existing models, including the first published benchmark for Ahwazi Arabic.
Omid Ghahroodi, Anas Madkoor, Dima Faris Alsaudi et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces EDRAC, the first large-scale benchmark for dialectal Arabic machine reading comprehension (MRC) and generative QA, covering five major dialects: Egyptian, Moroccan, Emirati, Syrian, and Saudi Arabic, and benchmarks Arabic-centric and multilingual LLMs on EDRAC using lexical and semantic metrics.
Noor Abo Mokh, K. Chirkunov, Teresa Lynn et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 24, 2026
A new method, called CW-Net, translates the reasoning process of an autonomous vehicle’s AI system into understandable concepts that explain its behavior.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.