Skip to content
Review

How AI amplifies, mitigates, and creates social biases: A tripartite framework.

Sep 2026 · Current Opinion in Psychology · Vol 73, pp. 102426 · 0 citations · 56 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This review synthesizes recent empirical literature within a tripartite framework organized around the core pathways along which AI shapes social biases: AI design, lay beliefs about how AI operates, and processes of social evaluation and attribution.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in social life, shaping how individuals perceive themselves and others and influencing social dynamics that bear directly on equality and collective welfare. Yet its relationship to social bias is paradoxical: the very systems that can entrench and amplify long-standing prejudices may also be leveraged to challenge them, and may simultaneously generate entirely novel forms of bias. This review synthesizes recent empirical literature within a tripartite framework organized around the core pathways along which AI shapes social biases: AI design, lay beliefs about how AI operates, and processes of social evaluation and attribution. Drawing on these pathways, I outline three corresponding avenues for intervention: more equitable AI design, targeted adjustment of lay beliefs about AI capabilities, and redesign of social evaluation processes to account for the attribution biases that AI introduces. Together, these findings underscore the urgency of a socially informed approach to AI development and governance.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Breaking the Single Voice: Perceived AI Plurality as an Autonomy-Supportive Architecture for Ethical Marketplace Decisions

Results show that structuring ethical recommendations through a plural AI architecture enhances consumers’ self–brand connection and strengthens self-brand connection and purchase intentions, suggesting plurality can function as an equity-enhancing design feature.

Mehak Bharti, Megha Bharti, Lubna Nafees · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Ethical Challenges in AI Recruitment: Beyond Technical Bias to the Reproduction of Social Inequalities

Recruitment processes play a central role in shaping access to employment and social mobility. The increasing use of artificial intelligence in these processes is beginning to change how candidates are evaluated, raising questions about whether regulatory frameworks are sufficient to address emerging challenges. Curren...

V. Felea, C. Ion · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

A coevolutionary account of normative human–AI interaction

This paper develops a coevolutionary account of extended morality in AI-mediated societies. Drawing on 4E cognition and theories of human–AI coevolution, it argues that the integration of aligned large language models into social practice reshapes the structure of moral agency itself. Alignment functions as technologic...

J. Noller · 0 citations
#generative ai Review Open access Sep 2026

The convergence paradox: a constructivist account of perceived template convergence and originative agency under generative artificial intelligence

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has raised a widely shared concern that human cognitive and creative output is drifting toward common templates. The terms used to describe this drift, including algorithmic monoculture, outcome homogenization, and the loss of collective diversity, all characterize systems, popul...

Qi-Tian Cao, Zi-Ran Zhou, Lin Wang et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Who can use AI sustainably? Habitus, digital capital, and the social structuring of sustainable AI practices

Artificial intelligence (AI) is frequently framed as a sustainability-enabling technology, yet its environmental implications vary across users. This article examines why identical AI systems generate uneven sustainability outcomes by conceptualizing sustainable AI use as a socially stratified socio-technical practic...

M. Ruiu, Gabriele Ruiu, Massimo Ragnedda · 0 citations

The perceived whiteness of artificial intelligence.

The findings show that AI is not perceived as socially neutral but instead acquires racial meanings associated with credibility, authority, and capability, demonstrating how social categories shape perceptions of novel technological entities beyond their underlying algorithmic properties.

M. Gamez-Djokic, Adam Waytz · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.