Jul 2026· Frontiers in Education· 3 citations· 38 references
TL;DR
This study synthesizes fragmented research on artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education governance and identifies key gaps for future research and policy and provides a useful lens for interpreting institutional adaptation.
Abstract
This study synthesizes fragmented research on artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education governance and identifies key gaps for future research and policy. Although AI has been widely examined in teaching and learning contexts, its role in institutional governance, strategic decision-making, resource allocation, quality assurance, risk management, and organizational learning remains less systematically understood.
Following PRISMA guidelines, 27 peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025 were selected from Web of Science and Scopus and analyzed through descriptive mapping and thematic synthesis.
AI adoption was concentrated in strategic, administrative, and risk-related governance domains, where predictive analytics and AI-integrated decision-support systems supported institutional coordination and data-informed decision-making. Operational efficiency and predictive accuracy were the most frequently emphasized outcomes, whereas transparency, accountability, trust, equity, workload redistribution, and governance reconfiguration remained comparatively underexamined. Three governance mechanisms were identified: anticipatory modelling, data-driven coordination, and accountability-oriented sense-making.
AI-enabled governance operates not only as a technical tool but also as an institutional infrastructure that reshapes feedback, information flows, and decision routines. Organizational learning provides a useful lens for interpreting institutional adaptation, although further empirical research is required on collaborative professional learning and university competitiveness. Future studies should strengthen theoretical foundations, use longitudinal and multi-institutional designs, examine AI integration in decision-making, and address ethical and policy challenges.
https://osf.io/ues47, identifier: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UES47.
The ability of institutions to leverage opportunities to transform governance in higher education depends on adopting anticipatory governance models that emphasize foresight and stakeholder engagement, as well as adopting changes to the traditional role of both leaders and educators to become data literate, inclusive,...
S. Baroudi· International Journal of Edu...· 2 citations
The study offers the Inclusive AI Governance-Readiness Framework, connecting institutional coordination, stakeholder engagement, readiness, and ethics for sustainable AI integration.
Doha Baladi, B. Guennoun· Journal of Interdisciplinary...· 0 citations
It is concluded that effective AI governance requires institutionally grounded arrangements that ensure AI supports, rather than undermines, the educational mission of higher education.
Tian-Zi Sun, Mark Joseph D. Pastor· American Journal of Educatio...· 0 citations
The framework demonstrates that the sustainable value derived from AI in higher education depends less on the level of the technology adopted than on the ethical bases and consistency of the leadership responsibility for its integration, offering higher education leaders and policymakers a structured path toward respon...
Asem S. Obied, Ahmed Raja Haj Ali· Frontiers in Education· 0 citations
The study concluded that effective governance requires combining research evidence, sectoral frameworks, and institutional policies, while translating general principles into clear procedures at the university and course levels, and revealed the need for more specialized policies that address privacy, linguistic equity...
Mohammed Al Mutawtah· Academic Journal of Research...· 0 citations
The review identifies transparency, explainability, human oversight, accountability, proportionality, co-design, and appeal mechanisms as core governance principles in the AIMS AI-Human Framework.
T. Anthuvan, Sunitha Prabhuram, Chirag B. Rathod· World Journal of Entrepreneu...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.