AgentRCA is introduced, a zero-shot agentic framework for evidence-grounded root cause analysis that produces transparent reasoning traces that explicitly link observed symptoms to their underlying physical causes and establishes autonomous hypothesis-driven reasoning as a practical foundation for scalable industrial root cause analysis.
Abstract
Diagnosing the root cause of anomalies is essential for safe industrial operation. Despite extensive sensor instrumentation, formulating hypotheses and gathering evidence remains a manual process, creating a major operational bottleneck. While existing data-driven approaches aim to automate this, two critical limitations restrict their deployment: their operate as black boxes unable to justify their diagnosis, and they require scarce labeled examples of faulty operation. To address this gap, we introduce AgentRCA, a zero-shot agentic framework for evidence-grounded root cause analysis. Rather than learning fault-specific mappings, AgentRCA performs inference-time reasoning by combining a data-driven digital twin (modeling normal system dynamics) with a tool-augmented large language model. The agent iteratively gathers statistical evidence, evaluates competing hypotheses, and identifies the physical fault that best explains the observed behavior. Evaluated on a real-world multiphase-flow facility and a large-scale chemical plant, AgentRCA achieves diagnostic performance competitive with fully supervised baselines without relying on fault-specific training. Crucially, it produces transparent reasoning traces that explicitly link observed symptoms to their underlying physical causes. These results establish autonomous hypothesis-driven reasoning as a practical foundation for scalable industrial root cause analysis.
Results demonstrate that the agent successfully identifies multiple concurrent root causes, produces actionable maintenance steps, and generalizes to synthetic failures, establishing a scalable, explainable framework for intelligent industrial maintenance.
Sarafudheen M. Tharayil, Dalia A. Albuqytah, Fuad Shalaan et al.· GOTECH· 0 citations
Results provide evidence that access to a scalable, objective training signal can be a more important constraint than model scale alone, and can make otherwise ambiguous diagnostic reasoning tasks amenable to scalable reinforcement learning.
WrenchBuddy is presented, a human-centered governance framework that manages three decisions during a fault episode: how much diagnostic structure to expose, what assistance posture to provide, and which first confirmatory question to prioritize.
Mowffq M. Alsanousi, Po-Chi Huang, Vittaldas V. Prabhu· Machines· 0 citations
AFANet is introduced, a lightweight graph-based framework that models interaction trajectories through step-level semantic signals and agent-level relationships and suggests that effective agent failure attribution does not require heavy LLM reasoning and a lightweight, structured approach can achieve strong performanc...
Ting-Wei Li, Yuan-Chen Bei, Xiao Lin et al.· 1 citation
The increasing deployment of AI agents in long-horizon tasks yields massive execution logs. Diagnosing failures within these records is crucial for reliability, as it transforms outcome-level signals into actionable interventions. The sheer scale of the data renders human review impractical, driving the need for automa...
Harsh Raj, David Lee, Anas Mahmoud et al.· 0 citations
This work shows that integrating structured abstractions with LLM-guided reasoning enables effective, reliable, and interpretable diagnosis for agent failures, and introduces the concept of neural invariants to specify agent behavior properties.
Jia-Yi Bi, Yanjie Gao, Yuan-Min Xie et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.