Skip to content
Open access

Formative Feedback Beyond Predefined Options: Eliciting Student-Generated Concepts in Large Classes by Adding Very Short Answers to an Audience Response System

Sep 2026 · Education sciences · 0 citations · 39 references

TL;DR

By eliciting student-generated concepts and reasoning, including unanticipated ones, VSA integration broadens formative feedback in ARS and enhances understanding and reducing anxiety.

Abstract

Within appropriate instructional frameworks, Audience Response Systems (ARS) can support active learning, retrieval practice, and feedback. However, they typically rely on selecting from predefined options, which limits active answer generation and insight into students’ reasoning. In this feasibility study, we integrated very short answers (VSA) into a hybrid ARS and examined whether free-text responses can be reliably aggregated in large classes, whether they extend student concepts beyond predefined options, and how students perceive the approach. First-semester medical students (n = 326) answered 26 questions in alternating multiple-choice (MC) and VSA formats, yielding 11,561 analyzed responses. Responses were automatically aggregated, and the ten largest aggregates per question were displayed in real time to guide discussion and feedback, capturing 74.6% of all responses and 40.3% of VSA responses. Students submitted more responses per answered question in MC than in VSA (mean difference = 0.35, 95% CI [0.31, 0.38], p < 0.001). Post hoc consolidation of conceptually identical expressions yielded 7.6 distinct concepts per question within the Top10 Aggregates, with VSA responses contributing concepts beyond the predefined MC options. Respondents perceived the approach as enhancing understanding and reducing anxiety. By eliciting student-generated concepts and reasoning, including unanticipated ones, VSA integration broadens formative feedback in ARS.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

A Mobile System for Formative Assessment and Teacher-Reviewed Feedback

Within the limits of this small-scale classroom evaluation, the findings suggest that rubric-guided LLM scoring may support formative assessment in mobile classrooms, provided teacher oversight is maintained for borderline cases.

Abylay Yerniyazov, Bakyt Bakayeva, Zhalgasbek Iztayev et al. · 1 citation
Open access 2026

Using Large Language Models to Generate Feedback for Educational Assessments: A Comparative Exploratory Study

Feedback in online environments can be an essential learning tool. However, prior research indicates that poorly designed feedback, particularly when punitive or generic, can undermine student motivation and self-perception (Schartel, 2012). In educational assessment, high-quality feedback can provide learners with inf...

Lucy Gitiria, A. Nasyrova, Peter Tran et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Consistently Good vs. Occasionally Great: A Rubric for Open-Ended Feedback Quality from Humans and Machines

This paper focuses on feedback for open-ended short answer questions in introductory programming, with the goal of nudging students toward success on reattempts without revealing the correct answer, and develops a five-criteria rubric grounded in educational literature for evaluating feedback quality.

Binglin Chen, Rajarshi Haldar, Max Fowler et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Understanding Student Effectiveness with AI Chatbots in Introductory Programming Education: An Interaction Analysis Study

Overall, interaction quality, not mere usage, appears to drive productive persistence, highlighting the importance of minimizing false negatives and encouraging Socratic scaffolding in educational chatbot design and deployment.

Rubaina Khan, Joshua Siderius, Kyle James Ross et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.