Aug 2026· Management Research Review· Vol 49, pp. 1005-1036· 0 citations· 39 references
TL;DR
This study advances AI leadership ethics by demonstrating that emotional sensitivity moderates the relationship between AI-supported decisions and ethical outcomes, and provides a context-sensitive framework that clarifies when AI can be used ethically and when human empathy is indispensable.
Abstract
This study aims to explore the ethical challenges of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into leadership decision-making, focusing on the shift from emotion-based to data-driven approaches. It examines the impact of AI on ethical considerations in leadership, with an emphasis on the role of emotional sensitivity as a moderator.
A quantitative approach was employed, utilizing a survey of 300 leaders and managers across various industries in China. The study introduced two novel scales: “AI-supported leadership decisions (AISLDS)” and “emotional sensitivity of leadership decision contexts (ESLDC).” Data was analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, along with regression analysis to test relationships between AI decision-making, emotional sensitivity and ethical considerations.
The study found a significant positive relationship between AISLDS and ethical considerations. Emotional sensitivity was found to moderate this relationship, highlighting that AI struggles with ethically consistent decisions in emotionally charged situations, suggesting that human judgment is crucial in these contexts.
The findings offer guidance for organizations on when AI is suitable for decision-making and when human empathy is essential. It suggests the need for leadership training that emphasizes the integration of AI with human judgment, ensuring that AI complements rather than replaces human compassion and moral reasoning. Additionally, the study informs the development of policies for ethically integrating AI into leadership.
This study advances AI leadership ethics by demonstrating that emotional sensitivity moderates the relationship between AI-supported decisions and ethical outcomes. Through two newly developed and validated scales (AISLDS and ESLDC), it provides a context-sensitive framework that clarifies when AI can be used ethically and when human empathy is indispensable.
The study aims to identify how the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) redefines leadership competencies in hybrid human-AI teams. By analyzing the perspectives of management practitioners, the research explores the evolution of the leader's role and how their personal level of AI adoption and comfort influence...
Katarzyna Mikołajczyk· 6th Current Issues in Busine...· 0 citations
The study aims to examine how leaders who explicitly embrace happiness and well-being as core values practice leadership during the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI). It investigates how such happiness-based leaders interpret and enact their roles and how employees experience these practices in terms of moti...
Isabel Barbosa, Elizabeth Real de Oliveira· Management Research: Journal...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in emotionally personalized customer experiences, enabling firms to analyze behavioral and affective data in real time and deliver highly adaptive interactions at scale. However, the effectiveness, adoption, and societal legitimacy of these systems depend on consume...
Hind El Bhilat, Mohammed Baaddi· Multidisciplinary Reviews· 0 citations
AI is transforming into a powerful decision support tool in organisations, but how AI recommendations are interpreted, communicated and governed by leaders is key to their value. This research aims to explore the mediating effect of leadership legitimacy on the relationship between the use of AI decision making, AI exp...
Tapas Gupta, Utpala Das· EPH – International Journal...· 0 citations
It is suggested that generative AI may not necessarily alter final ethical judgments but may be associated with broader exploration of perspectives prior to reaching those judgments.
The purpose of this paper is to integrate positive psychology and artificial intelligence (AI) into leadership development by proposing a six-dimensional model for preparing executives to lead effectively in AI-intensive organizational environments.
Drawing on a conceptual synthesis of peer-reviewed literatu...
Michael J. Provitera, Mostafa Sayyadi, H. Kazeroony· SAM Advanced Management Jour...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.