Skip to content
Review Open access

10 insights for harnessing artificial intelligence in scientific research: supervisor perspectives

Aug 2026 · MedEdPublish · 0 citations · 35 references

TL;DR

A structured supervisory approach following the 10 insights can help balance the efficiency of AI tools with research integrity, accountability, and meaningful human mentorship.

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) transforms scientific research and publication by supporting all aspects of research from setting up hypothesis and research objectives to data analysis and manuscript preparation. Its widespread use in postgraduate research by students improves efficiency and feedback, but also raises concerns related to academic integrity, ethical behavior, algorithmic bias, hallucinated outputs, copyright issues, and mainly, preservation of students’ critical thinking skills. This article presents supervisor-oriented guidance for the responsible integration of AI into scientific research supervision. Methods We have undertaken narrative synthesis based on published manuscripts as well as our collective supervisory experience with AI-assisted research projects. Published literature evidence and practical experience were integrated to develop 10 insights for supervisors guiding research students who use AI tools during all aspects of their research. Results We have generated 10 practical insights for supervisors on guiding research students with ethical AI use: Establishing transparency and accountability; Setting expectations; Creating a customised AI use agreement; Maintenance of AI Use Log for Review; Reviewing AI log – The supervisor’s role; Addressing data privacy and ethical risks; Assessment of students’ critical thinking and conceptual understanding; Guide verification and validation of AI-generated content; Prepare students to justify AI-related decisions during post-research evaluation; and Institutional support for supervisor competency. Together, these recommendations emphasize the importance of human oversight, documentation and verification to distinguish AI assistance and original student scholarship. Conclusions AI can enhance postgraduate research and supervision when used as a transparent and ethically governed tool rather than as a shortcut. Supervisors have a central role in ensuring students’ ethical research practices evident by clear documentation of AI use, verification and transparency. A structured supervisory approach following the 10 insights can help balance the efficiency of AI tools with research integrity, accountability, and meaningful human mentorship.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#generative ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial intelligence in scientific research: a practical guide to tools and ethical considerations

Artificial intelligence (AI), including generative AI and large language models (LLMs), is rapidly transforming scientific research. It is increasingly being integrated into multiple stages of the research process. The public release of ChatGPT in November 2022 contributed to increased adoption of these technologies, c...

E. M. Alakraa, Amgad Abd El Raouf Farhat · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

A Review of the TITAN Guideline: Advancing Transparency and Responsible Artificial Intelligence Use in Medical Research and Scholarly Publishing

The TITAN guidelines are reviewed as a practical framework for improving transparency and responsible reporting of AI use in medical research and scholarly publishing and can accommodate emerging AI technologies, including multimodal and agentic systems.

Arzoo Nazir, Shah Zeb · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Open access Oct 2026

Assessment of Artificial Intelligence in Students' Research

This study examines the growing influence of artificial intelligence (AI) tools on student research in higher education, focusing on both their opportunities and challenges, and recommends comprehensive institutional guidelines, targeted training programs, and ethical frameworks to ensure responsible integration of AI.

Edelresa S Juachon, Honorata Yaneza, Arthur Cabradilla et al. · 0 citations
#generative ai Review Open access Aug 2026

Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence Use on the Academic Performance of Undergraduate Students in Canada

This paper synthesizes peer-reviewed and carefully delimited contextual research on how generative AI use relates to undergraduate academic performance, with attention to what Canadian universities can already act on.

Pragalvha Sharma · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Normative boundaries of AI in scientific work: Evidence from PhD researchers

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in scientific work, but researchers may not evaluate its use uniformly across research tasks. This study examines task-specific attitudes towards AI among an international, self-selected sample of 3,785 PhD students in STEM and medical and health sciences who partic...

Francesco Angelini, Johan Lyrvall · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Educational Supervision and Leadership: A Scoping Review of Trends, Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions

AI's ability to change educational leadership and supervision has garnered attention due to its rapid expansion. Early research has examined AI applications in educational administration, leadership decision-making, and learning analytics, but research on its effects on educational supervision is fragmented. Authors wi...

Rachmat Satria · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.