Skip to content
Review Open access

Artificial Intelligence in Medical Writing: A Practical and Ethical Framework for Surgical Research and Publication

Jul 2026 · World Journal of Surgery · Vol 50, pp. 2625 - 2632 · 0 citations · 20 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This narrative review examines the contemporary AI ecosystem relevant to medical writing, including LLMs, retrieval‐augmented systems, structured evidence extraction platforms, citation analytics tools, AI‐enhanced academic databases, and emerging agentic AI systems.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming surgical research and medical publishing by changing how clinicians discover, evaluate, synthesize, and communicate scientific evidence. Despite widespread adoption, practical guidance on the responsible integration of AI into academic writing remains limited, particularly as large language models (LLMs) and emerging AI systems become increasingly sophisticated. Methods This narrative review examines the contemporary AI ecosystem relevant to medical writing, including LLMs, retrieval‐augmented systems, structured evidence extraction platforms, citation analytics tools, AI‐enhanced academic databases, and emerging agentic AI systems. Current evidence relating to AI‐assisted manuscript preparation, ethical considerations, governance, confidentiality, reproducibility, and scientific integrity was reviewed. A practical workflow integrating literature discovery, evidence extraction, synthesis, citation validation, and editorial refinement is proposed. Results AI can substantially improve the efficiency, organization, clarity, and consistency of manuscript preparation while supporting evidence retrieval, synthesis, and editorial refinement. However, responsible use requires awareness of important limitations, including hallucinated references, publication bias amplification, confidentiality risks, language weighting, and the inability of current LLMs to distinguish reliably between truth and plausibility. The review also highlights the increasing integration of academic databases with AI‐assisted retrieval and synthesis, together with the emergence of agentic research systems capable of performing increasingly complex scientific workflows under human supervision. Conclusions AI should be regarded as an adjunct to, not a substitute for, scientific reasoning and scholarly judgment. When used transparently and under expert supervision, AI can enhance the quality and efficiency of medical writing while preserving the central intellectual responsibilities of authorship, interpretation, verification, and accountability. As AI systems become increasingly autonomous, maintaining rigorous human oversight will become progressively more important.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#generative ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial intelligence in scientific research: a practical guide to tools and ethical considerations

Artificial intelligence (AI), including generative AI and large language models (LLMs), is rapidly transforming scientific research. It is increasingly being integrated into multiple stages of the research process. The public release of ChatGPT in November 2022 contributed to increased adoption of these technologies, c...

E. M. Alakraa, Amgad Abd El Raouf Farhat · 0 citations
#generative ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Responsible Integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Clinical and Health Sciences Publishing

This editorial highlights the evolving principles of responsible GAI use in publishing, including the prohibition of GAI authorship, disclosure of GAI assistance, and continued human oversight.

N. Razali, Siti Norsyafika Kamaruddin, A. Shuid · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MODERN MEDICINE: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF CURRENT APPLICATIONS, CHALLENGES, AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

This review evaluates the current state of AI applications in medicine, focusing on clinical knowledge encoding, molecular drug discovery, and administrative workflow optimization, while critically addressing the technical, ethical, and systemic challenges of their institutional implementation.

Aleksandra Stańczyk, Kinga Haduch, Zuzanna Michalska et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

BEYOND ACCURACY: EXPLAINABILITY, WORKFLOW, AND GOVERNANCE IN THE CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

A review examines how free full-text PubMed literature describes the real-world implementation of AI in healthcare and identifies the technical, organizational, ethical, and social conditions that shape adoption.

Jagoda Pałubska, Oliwer Műller, Zuzanna Rafałowska et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial intelligence in mental health: A narrative review of applications, benefits, and ethical challenges

The review found that AI tools—for example, selfreferral chatbots that reduced waiting times and increased treatment uptake—provide expanded 24/7 access, improved clinical efficiency, and potential for individualised personalisation, while Predictive models showed promise for treatment selection and risk stratification...

Shizal Nawaz, Laiba Nawaz, Hasnain Ali et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.