Sidekick significantly improved multitasking performance with CUAs compared to baseline systems that presented textual feedback either in a typical chat or in an ambient display, and discussed implications for long-horizon human-agent collaboration.
Abstract
Computer Use Agents (CUAs) can autonomously execute complex, multi-step tasks within GUIs, enhancing efficiency through parallel multitasking. However, our formative studies with CUA experts and GenAI users indicated that current feedback is primarily text-based, requiring sustained attention to monitor progress and offering limited visibility to trace past GUI interactions. Based on the findings, we developed a prototype system, Sidekick, for communicating CUAs'status with multimodal feedback across different stages of interaction: (i) When CUAs run in the background, Sidekick signals its execution state through ambient cues. (ii) Upon resuming interaction with CUAs, Sidekick provides multimodal summaries of completed actions to support rapid context resumption. (iii) When CUAs operate in the foreground, Sidekick enhances transparency by verbalizing and visualizing the agent's reasoning. A study with 30 participants demonstrated that Sidekick significantly improved multitasking performance with CUAs compared to baseline systems that presented textual feedback either in a typical chat or in an ambient display. Sidekick supported progress awareness, and error and action traceability more effectively. Finally, we demonstrate the promise of Sidekick through several example applications, and discuss implications for long-horizon human-agent collaboration.
The findings suggest that the primary benefit of human--agent interfaces may be reducing interaction effort rather than improving speed, and that delegation reflects who the user is more than what the task demands.
Gavin Raine Dizon, Tyrone Justin Sta Maria, J. A. Deja et al.· 0 citations
It is suggested that chatbot communication style influences users’ perceptions of conversational agents and may improve performance relative to less supportive chatbot designs, but the overall value of chatbot interaction depends on the task context.
Erik Derner, Dalibor Kučera, Aditya Gulati et al.· 0 citations
A three-week diary study with 8 blind users using OLLA, a screen-reader-accessible CUA prototype, collecting 1,258 commands across 12 applications with screenshots, UI trees, model responses, and action traces reveals grounding, planning, constraint-tracking, and termination failures, while interviews reveal beyond-aut...
Satwik Ram Kodandaram, Monalika Padma Reddy, Xiaojun Bi et al.· 0 citations
It is suggested that the benefit of the agentic framework lies primarily in interaction quality rather than conversational efficiency, and the agentic architecture displayed robustness by recovering from non-normative inputs while maintaining strict goal alignment.
Evaluation of Computer-Use Agents (CUAs) is often limited to the final deliverables they create (at the end of hundreds of steps) and assessed with functional verifiers, as seen in OSWorld. However, such evaluation of end-state performance lacks transparency into how and why agents fail in various tasks, obfuscating cr...
Zhi-Lin Wang, Shao-Kun Zhang, Yi-Fan Zhang et al.· 0 citations
A framework for evaluating and improving a large-scale, multi-agent shopping assistant in production in production is presented, and lessons from its use are reported.
Kasra Hosseini, Wen-Sen Cheng, Marco-Andrea Buchmann et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.