Aug 2026· Sign Systems Studies· Vol 54, pp. 15-40· 0 citations· 34 references
Abstract
A distinctive creative atmosphere, dialogue, and the application of ‘language for oneself’ (in Juri Lotman’s terms), along with other features, characterize the intellectual environment of the Tartu–Moscow School of Semiotics. These elements are vividly reflected in the 1960s correspondence between Juri Lotman and Boris Egorov – two prominent members of the school, who developed a unique code of communication through creative devices. The publication of their letters brings to light the paradox discussed by Lotman in his article entitled “The text and the structure of its audience”: a text gains value through its undecipherability for a new audience. The study aims to identify the main techniques that act as carriers of creative memory, drawing on Lotman’s concept of ‘language for oneself’ and his theory of cultural memory. A semiotic approach is used to decipher the code of communication and reconstruct the underlying contexts, revealing the layered meanings within the correspondence. The analysis delivers a deeper insight into the intellectual discourse of both authors, in which the code of communication accumulates indirect information about the past, and the creative devices employed in it serve not only as a form of intellectual play but also reveal a subtle “draft of the past”, including what was impossible or undesirable in the USSR. Thus, the research highlights the role of epistolary practices in sustaining the intellectual tradition of the Tartu–Moscow School of Semiotics and in developing a poetics of memory that ensures the continuity, cohesion, and subtle transmission of its cultural and creative legacy.
The article undertakes an interdisciplinary study of the speech about comradeship in N. V. Gogol's novel «Taras Bulba», combining the hermeneutic principles of F. Schleiermacher, the tools of social philosophy and linguistic and cultural analysis. The focus is on discursive ways of forming collective identity in the ho...
S. V. Solovev· Abyss (Studies in Philosophy...· 0 citations
This article explores the artistic understanding and cultural imagination of a newly acquired region during its territorial integration. In V. K. Arsenyev’s case, this is the southern part of the Russian Far East. The focus is on the dualism characteristic of such historical experience — that of the traveler, symbolizi...
K. V. Anisimov· Two centuries of the Russian...· 0 citations
The relevance of the topic
is due to the need to revise the simplistic view of Soviet drama of the 1970
s
as exclusively ideologically engaged or “production-oriented”, as well as the growing scholarly interest in the existential dimension of late Soviet literature.
The problem lies in the fact that exi...
N. V. Tomashevskaya· Vestnik of North-Eastern Fed...· 0 citations
This paper aims to analyze the neologisms created and/or resignified by Eliane Brum in her work Banzeiro Òkòtó: uma viagem à Amazônia centro do mundo (2021), considering them as mechanisms for producing identity meaning and strategies of discursive resistance. Based on the understanding that language is not just a neut...
Abstract The article examines Jurij M. Lotman’s Universe of the Mind from the perspective of productive misinterpretation. Proceeding from the observation that misunderstanding, incomplete translation, and communicative disruption are conceptualised by Lotman not as deficiencies but as constitutive conditions of cultur...
Johannes Werner· Journal of Literary Theory· 0 citations
The work provides a critical analysis of the mechanisms for shaping the image of Russia's technological leadership in the digital environment, with special attention to the role of mimetic culture. It has been shown that this image does not function as a fixed «brand» or «image,» but as a mobile, open to transformation...
A. Shavlokhova, N. Lukianova· Abyss (Studies in Philosophy...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.