Aug 2026· Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation· Vol 22, pp. 275 - 287· 0 citations· 29 references
TL;DR
It is argued that explainable AI (XAI) constitutes a necessary, and currently undertheorised, layer in the design of consumer-facing AI systems, and a theoretical foundation for researchers, practitioners and policymakers to close the gap between AI capability and accountability in marketing.
Abstract
The diffusion of artificial intelligence into marketing practice has brought with it a fundamental governance problem: The most predictively capable AI systems are, typically, the least interpretable. This opacity creates information asymmetries between firms and consumers and complicates the ethical legitimacy of automated marketing decisions. This article argues that explainable AI (XAI) constitutes a necessary, and currently undertheorised, layer in the design of consumer-facing AI systems. Drawing on consumer trust theory, algorithmic decision-making research and marketing ethics literature, we develop the explainable marketing AI (XMAI) framework: a theoretical model proposing four interdependent components—algorithmic transparency, contextual relevance, consumer empowerment and ethical accountability—that jointly govern the deployment of explainable AI systems in marketing contexts. Four propositions link these components to consumer trust, perceived fairness, long-term engagement and consumer well-being. The framework is developed in the context of India and comparable developing economies, where rapid AI adoption in marketing is outpacing governance infrastructure, and where consumer digital literacy and institutional trust present conditions that differ from the Western settings in which most AI ethics frameworks have been formulated. The article contributes a theoretical foundation for researchers, practitioners and policymakers to close the gap between AI capability and accountability in marketing.
A conceptual governance framework is developed that explains how explainable AI (XAI) improves algorithmic transparency, enhances consumer understanding, strengthens perceptions of fairness and ultimately builds consumer trust in AI-driven marketing analytics systems.
Jasmeet Kaur· Asia-Pacific Journal of Mana...· 0 citations
Despite growing adoption of artificial intelligence in marketing, consumers frequently resist or avoid AI-driven interactions, a phenomenon that remains theoretically fragmented across disciplines. This paper presents an integrative review of 43 peer-reviewed studies published between 2023 and 2025, employing thematic...
Pagon Gatchalee· International Conference on...· 0 citations
While consumer protection of the environment has become a concern in recent years in all parts of the world, an attitude-behavior gap remains that hinders turning pro-environmental attitudes into sustainable purchases. While AI, specifically personalized AI, is slowly becoming a digital marketer's go-to, the ability of...
Sajiramol Av, Jisana Tk, Noorjahan Ka et al.· International Journal of Lat...· 0 citations
The findings support risk-calibrated pre-deployment oversight while highlighting comparatively less consistent public disclosure of lifecycle monitoring after deployment.
Umme Aimen Khan· Journal of Economics, Financ...· 0 citations
Regulators and public interest activists increasingly advocate for full transparency in customer-facing AI. However, an empirical meta-synthesis of 17 studies (N=14,820) reveals a critical transparency dilemma: uncontextualized raw AI disclosures trigger negative persuasion knowledge, reducing consumer trust by 1.12 to...
Sana Hussan· Global Social Sciences Revie...· 0 citations
Results show that structuring ethical recommendations through a plural AI architecture enhances consumers’ self–brand connection and strengthens self-brand connection and purchase intentions, suggesting plurality can function as an equity-enhancing design feature.