Skip to content
Review Open access

Generative AI Risk Governance in Organizational Information Systems: A Conceptual Model Integrating Security, Ethics, and Digital Trust

Jul 2026 · International Journal for Sciences and Technology · Vol 5, pp. 184-202 · 0 citations

TL;DR

A conceptual model of Generative AI risk governance is developed by integrating AI governance readiness, information security control, ethical AI awareness, user digital trust, and AI adoption effectiveness to explain how organizations can adopt Generative AI in a secure, ethical, responsible, and trusted manner.

Abstract

The rapid adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence in organizational information systems has created new opportunities for improving productivity, decision-making, service innovation, and knowledge management. However, its implementation also introduces critical risks related to data privacy, information security, inaccurate outputs, algorithmic bias, ethical misuse, and declining user trust. Objective: This study aims to develop a conceptual model of Generative AI risk governance by integrating AI governance readiness, information security control, ethical AI awareness, user digital trust, and AI adoption effectiveness. The model is proposed to explain how organizations can adopt Generative AI in a secure, ethical, responsible, and trusted manner. Methodology: This study employed a conceptual research design using an integrative literature review approach. Data were collected from secondary academic sources, including peer-reviewed journal articles, reputable conference proceedings, and official technical reports relevant to Generative AI, information systems, cybersecurity, AI ethics, responsible AI governance, and digital trust. The data were analyzed through thematic synthesis to identify conceptual domains, relationships among constructs, and research propositions. Findings: The findings indicate that AI governance readiness serves as a foundational construct that strengthens information security control and ethical AI awareness. These two mechanisms contribute to user digital trust, which subsequently supports the effectiveness of Generative AI adoption in organizational information systems. Implications: This study implies that organizations should not adopt Generative AI solely based on technological benefits. Organizations need to establish governance policies, security controls, ethical guidelines, user education, and trust-building strategies to ensure that Generative AI implementation is safe, accountable, and aligned with organizational objectives. Originality: The originality of this study lies in its integrated conceptual framework, which connects technology adoption, information security, AI ethics, responsible AI governance, and digital trust into a single model for responsible Generative AI implementation in organizational information systems.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Human-Centered AI Adoption in Organizational Human Resource Management: Determinants and Implementation Strategies

The proposed framework analyzes technology acceptance, algorithm transparency, human–AI collaboration, and privacy protection as interconnected components of an intelligent management architecture and develops an implementation framework that combines employee participation, explainable decision mechanisms, and data-go...

Mr Yang · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

AI-Driven HR Governance in Global Organizations: Integrating Ethical Intelligence, Risk Management, and Regulatory Compliance

Background: The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in human resource management has transformed recruitment, employee evaluation, workforce analytics, and decision-making. However, the growing use of AI also introduces ethical concerns, algorithmic bias, privacy risks, accountability challenges, and increas...

Jaganathan Balaji · 0 citations
Conference Open access Aug 2026

Generative AI as a Knowledge Governance Mechanism: The Role of Digital Trust and Information Security

The results show that AI use significantly increases digital trust, which in turn improves decision quality, and indicates that the impact of generative AI on decision-making depends on governance conditions rather than technology alone.

Justyna Żywiołek · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Government Institutions: Ethical Governance, Public Trust, and Risk Management

The findings demonstrate that the adoption of responsible AI cannot be achieved through technological means alone but also requires a commitment to comprehensive governance mechanisms, and the sequential interaction and interdependence of governance factors reduce operational and societal risks, increase transparency a...

Ghazwan Hani Hussein, Faiza Mohamed, A. Abuzreda · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Governing AI Adoption in Government Administration: An Integrative Framework for AI Governance and Data Privacy

This paper aims to develop an integrated framework for governing the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in government administration by linking AI adoption with governance, data privacy, transparency, accountability, workforce readiness, and regulatory controls spanning the system's lifecycle. The paper employs a...

M. Alenezi · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

AI Governance and SME Performance: The Roles of Governance Quality, Risk Management, And Employee AI Literacy in Vietnam

This study investigates the links among AI risk management capability, internal AI governance quality, and organizational performance in SMEs while also assessing the moderating role of employee AI literacy. Building on Dynamic Capabilities Theory and Sociotechnical Systems Theory, it frames organizational performance...

Vinh Minh Vo, Linh Hac Hoang, Han Kha Luu · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.