The proposed framework analyzes technology acceptance, algorithm transparency, human–AI collaboration, and privacy protection as interconnected components of an intelligent management architecture and develops an implementation framework that combines employee participation, explainable decision mechanisms, and data-governance strategies.
Abstract
The increasing adoption of artificial intelligence in organizational management requires effective integration of intelligent decision support, human-centered design, and secure information governance. This study investigates the key determinants affecting human-centered AI adoption in human resource management and develops an implementation framework that combines employee participation, explainable decision mechanisms, and data-governance strategies. The proposed framework analyzes technology acceptance, algorithm transparency, human–AI collaboration, and privacy protection as interconnected components of an intelligent management architecture. Furthermore, a dual-track decision model is introduced to balance automated analytical efficiency with human judgment in high-impact management scenarios. To support trustworthy deployment, a governance structure incorporating hierarchical access control, privacy-preserving computation, ethical review mechanisms, and transparent information management is established. The framework also emphasizes continuous feedback, interpretability, and employee engagement to improve system acceptance and operational reliability. By integrating intelligent information processing, explainable decision support, and secure data governance, the proposed approach provides an engineering-oriented methodology for trustworthy AI deployment and human–AI collaborative management in data-intensive organizational environments.
A conceptual model of Generative AI risk governance is developed by integrating AI governance readiness, information security control, ethical AI awareness, user digital trust, and AI adoption effectiveness to explain how organizations can adopt Generative AI in a secure, ethical, responsible, and trusted manner.
Nurdiyanto Yusuf· International Journal for Sc...· 0 citations
The study argues that collaborative intelligence should be viewed as an organizational capability rather than merely a technological outcome, requiring deliberate management of human judgment, ethical responsibility, and organizational design.
M. R· International Journal of Phi...· 0 citations
AI capability is a new strategic capability in the organization that goes beyond operational efficiency and can support the quality strategic decision-making, sustainable performance of an organization, and high decision quality. Though AI capability is evolving, current research remains disparate in how to transform a...
M. Alshamsi· Journal of Intelligent Decis...· 0 citations
A lifecycle-oriented socio-technical governance capacity framework through a structured synthesis of public administration, digital government, decision support systems, responsible AI, socio-technical systems, sustainability, and risk governance scholarship is developed.
The findings demonstrate that the adoption of responsible AI cannot be achieved through technological means alone but also requires a commitment to comprehensive governance mechanisms, and the sequential interaction and interdependence of governance factors reduce operational and societal risks, increase transparency a...
Ghazwan Hani Hussein, Faiza Mohamed, A. Abuzreda· Journal of Technology and Sy...· 0 citations
This paper reconceptualizes managerial rationality in artificial intelligence (AI)-augmented decision-making through the notion of algorithmic-bounded rationality (ABR). It argues that AI does not remove boundedness but relocates it into algorithmic constraints related to data volatility, model opacity and governan...
Z.-S. Chen· Management Decision· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.